R. Madhavan v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri
2014-11-03
ARUNA JAGADEESAN, M.JAICHANDREN
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment M. Jaichandren, J. 1. Heardthe learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that, though the prayer is for a larger relief, it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 30.9.2014, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame specified by this Court. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection for this court passing such an order. 3. In such circumstances, we find it appropriate to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 30.9.2014, if it is otherwise in order, and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the representation, dated 30.9.2014, to the respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.