JUDGMENT U.C. Dhyani, J. An FIR was lodged against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner No. 1 is the husband of respondent no. 3. The other petitioners are the family members and relatives of petitioner no. 1. Issue notice to respondent no. 3. Steps be taken within a week. List after the notice is served upon the said respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that some kind of interim protection from arrest be given to the petitioner no. 1. Learned counsel placed a copy of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court on 2 July, 2014, in Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014, captioned as Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another. This Court has carefully considered the judgment cited by learned counsel for the petitioners. It is provided that the petitioner-husband should be arrested only when the Investigating Officer has reason to believe, on the basis of information and material collected, that he has committed an offence. Before making arrest, the Investigating Officer is required to satisfy himself that the arrest is necessary for one or more purposes envisaged by Sub-Clause (a) to (e) of Clause (1) of Section 41 of Cr. P.C. It will not be based upon the ipse dixit of the Police Officer. In other words, the petitioner shall be arrested only when the conditions stipulated in Sub Clauses (a) to (e) of Clause (1) of Section 41 of Cr. P.C. are satisfied. It is further provided, as an interim measure, that no coercive measures shall be taken against the petitioner nos. 2 to 6, during the course of interrogation and investigation, so long as they cooperate with the Investigating Agency. This interim order is only valid till the next date of listing. CLMA No. 10849 of 2014 is accordingly disposed of.