Judgment Heard, counsel for the petitioner. 2. Considering the finding recorded by the Inquiry Officer and which has been up-held by the appellate Authority, no interference, in exercise of writ jurisdiction, is warranted. 3. The attempt of the petitioner was to persuade this Court to reappreciate the factual aspects with reference to the charge proved against the petitioner. 4. It is not open to us to re-appreciate the evidence on record. It is not the argument of the petitioner that material evidence and including defence version has not been considered by the Inquiry Officer or the appellate Authority. That grievance, if were to be accepted, perhaps could have been the basis to interfere in the matter. 5. Re-appreciating material on record to overturn the finding of fact recorded by the Inquiry Officer is not the scope of judicial review in domestic enquiry matters. 6. Hence, dismissed.