Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 435 (UTT)

Mannu Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand

2014-10-07

SUDHANSHU DHULIA

body2014
Judgment Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the complainant. The applicant is in jail having been implicated in F.I.R. No.324 of 2014, which has been registered under Sections 147/148/149/307/504/506/364/511 of I.P.C. at Police Station – Rudrapur, District – Udham Singh Nagar. Although it is alleged in the First Information Report that a rifle was also used to inflict injuries on the victim but the medical report of the injured victim does not indicate so. Infact it has also come in the statement of eye witness that no firearm was used. Considering the overall evidence which is presently available before this Court, the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is accordingly allowed. Let the applicant (Mannu Sharma) be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.