Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 464 (UTT)

Tausif Qureshi v. State of Uttarakhand

2014-10-15

SUDHANSHU DHULIA

body2014
Judgment Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Ms. Khushboo Tiwari Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand. The applicant is in jail having been implicated in F.I.R./Case Crime No.32 of 2014, which has been registered under Sections 379/411 of I.P.C. at Police Station – Kathgodam, District - Nainital. There is no public witness of the alleged recovery. According to the applicant he has no criminal history. He is in jail since 23.04.2014. Considering the overall evidence which is presently available before this Court, prima facie the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is accordingly allowed. Let the applicant (Tausif Qureshi) be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.