Judgment M. Jaichandren, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent Bank. 2. A number of grounds have been raised, by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, challenging the e-auction sale notice issued by the first respondent Bank, dated 18.12.2013. 3. In similar circumstances, this court had passed an order, dated 20.2.2014, in W.P.No.34376 of 2013 etc. (batch), wherein e-auction sale notices had been challenged. In the said order, dated 20.2.2014, this Court had upheld the validity of the e-auction sale procedures adopted by the respondent Banks concerned, while bringing the secured assets for sale, in discharge of the liabilities of the petitioner. As such, the issues raised for the consideration of this court, in the present writ petition, are covered by the decision of this court, dated 20.2.2014. 4. In such circumstances, we are of the considered view that, in view of the order passed by this Court, in W.P.No.34376 of 2013 etc. (batch), dated 20.2.2014, the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, cannot be granted. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.