JUDGMENT Mr. Inderjit Singh, J.:- These petitions have been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.84 dated 03.09.2011 under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Jamalpur, Ludhiana, Punjab. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have already joined the investigation. They have been on interim bail since 06.03.2012. The challan has already been presented and charges have also been framed against the petitioners. Nothing is to be recovered from them. Now, the petitioners have to face the trial only. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. 5. From the record, I find that this is a matrimonial dispute between the parties. As per the allegations of the complainant, the accused tried to put poison forcibly in her mouth and also tried to strangulate her. The petitioners have been granted interim bail since long and they have already joined the investigation. They are not required for any custodial interrogation, nor anything is to be recovered from them. Challan has already been presented on 05.06.2013. As argued by the learned State counsel, charges have also been framed on 12.02.2014. Now, the petitioners have to face trial only and no useful purpose will be served by sending them to custody. Otherwise also, the petitioners are denying the alleged occurrence and have stated that much before the occurrence, petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed. 6. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petitions are accepted and the interim orders dated 06.03.2012, granting interim bail to the petitioners are made absolute. ---------0.B.S.0------------