JUDGMENT Pankaj Mithal,J.: - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for quashing of the order dated 18.12.2013 passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.) in Original Suit No.651 of 2013 (Rojid and others Vs. M/s Sukhveer Agra Energy Ltd.). The order impugned is an ex-parte injunction order in favour of the respondents restraining petitioners from raising any construction over the disputed Arazi Nos.6012, 657 and 697. 3. The petitioners have already filed application under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. for modifying/vacating the said interim order. The petitioners also have remedy of filing objections against the interim injunction application and to get the injunction application finally decided or to prefer an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1. 4. In view of the above, I do not consider it fit to interfere in the matter at this stage. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners further contended that the suit itself is not maintainable as the acquisition of the land in favour of the petitioner has been upheld by this Court vide judgment and order dated 3.10.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.47315 of 2013. 6. The said writ petition was not filed by the petitioner but by the Gaon Sabha. Moreover, in case the petitioners feel that the suit is not maintainable or it is barred by some law, the proper remedy available to the petitioners is to file application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint or to get an issued framed in this regard. 7. The petitioners cannot get any relief or get adjudicated the aforesaid dispute in this petition at this stage. 8. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the court concern to consider and decide the above application of the petitioners under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. and to ensure that it is decided within the outer limit of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. Petition is disposed of.