JUDGMENT Mr. M. Jeyapaul, J. (Oral):- Petitioner Avtar Singh moves this petition praying for regular bail having been in custody right from 26.12.2013. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was not named in the FIR. Even otherwise, he had not caused any injury which would fall under the penal provision of Section 307 IPC. There is also a cross version as regards the present occurrence. Therefore, it is his submission that the petitioner is entitled to bail. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned AAG, Punjab would submit that though the name of the petitioner does not find a place in the first information report, the other injured person during the course of investigation disclosed that the petitioner caused a grievous injury armed with a lethal weapon. The other accused are absconding. Therefore, the petition for bail may be dismissed, it is submitted. 4. The petitioner has not caused any fire arm injury which culminated in the allegation of attempting to commit murder. The first information report was lodged by one of the injured witnesses. He had not named the petitioner in the first information report. As rightly pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is also a cross version as regards the present occurrence. 5. Learned AAG, Punjab would fairly submit that qua the petitioner, the investigation was completed, but the charge-sheet is yet to be laid. 6. For all these reasons, I find that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of bail. 7. Therefore, bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana.