Judgment Heard. 2. This writ appeal has been filed by the appellants State against the order 16/7/2013 passed by the Writ Court in WP 6709/10. 3. The writ Court has held that the respondent was eligible to get benefit of Kramonnati. 4. We have perused the impugned order. The appellants/State have not given any cogent reason to the effect why the respondent was not eligible to get benefit of Kramonnati. In such circumstances, in our opinion, the order passed by the Writ Court is in accordance with law. 5. Because we have considered the appeal on merits, hence, it is not necessary to pass any order on IA 2651/14 an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 6. Consequently, we do not find any merit in this appeal. It is hereby dismissed.