JUDGMENT Manoj Misra,J.: - Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. By the present application, the applicant has sought for quashing of the summoning order dated 05.10.2013 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur in Complaint Case No.1946 of 2010 by which the applicant has been summoned, under Sections 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Hapur Kotwali, District Hapur. 3. A perusal of the record reveals that, as per the allegations in the complaint, on account of certain disputes with regards to the settlement of payment for supply of computer parts etc., the applicant, who is an accused, entered the shop of the complainant and threatened him after abusing him. 4. As the complaint allegations are supported by statement recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., I do not find any good reason to quash the proceedings. 5. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned and apply for bail, within a period of four weeks from today, his bail application shall be considered in accordance with law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P.: 2004(57) ALR 290, decided by a Full Bench of this Court, which has been approved by the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.: 2009(3) ADJ 322 (SC). It is made clear that coercive processes, if any, have not been stayed. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the application stands disposed of.