ORDER : Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Leave granted. 2. These appeals have been preferred by the accused appellants against the judgment and order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Application No.4763, 4762 and 4825 of 2010. By the impugned order at the instance of respondent Union of India the High Court cancelled the bail granted to the appellants in the N.D.P.S Special Case No.33 of 2009 by the learned Special Judge for N.D.P.S. case at Thane. 3. The stand of the respondent Union of India before the High Court was that Diazepam covered under Schedule I to the NDPS Rules could not be possessed by any person and the possession of such substance could be regulated only by the provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act. In view of such submission advanced on behalf of the Union of India the bail granted to the appellants was cancelled. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants brought to our notice that the licence for manufacture and sale (or for distribution) of drugs other than those specified in Schedule C, C(l) & X manufactured by M/s Shree Sharda Chemicals included Diazepam I.P/B.P/E.P/U.S.P. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow the prayer, set aside the impugned order and direct that the appellants shall be enlarged on bail subject to their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Case, at Thane. 6. The appeals stand disposed of.