JUDGMENT Virendra Vikram Singh,J.: - Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made, relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. 3. No case for quashing the proceedings and order dated 10.10.2013 is made out and as such the prayer is declined. 4. However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court concerned within a period of thirty days from today along with the certified copy of the present order and apply for bail, then their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously. 5. For a period of thirty days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 6. However, in case the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them and no protection of this order shall be available to them. 7. It is being made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the subordinate court shall exercise its independent discretion in deciding the application for bail. 8. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the application is finally disposed of.