ORDER 1. In the present petition, filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, two petitioners have prayed for quashing of an order dated 18.1.2010 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (hereinafter referred to as C.J.M.), Kaimur at Bhabhua, in Complaint Case No. 1298 of 2008. By the said order learned C.J.M. has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and directed for summoning the petitioners. 2. Short fact of the case is that the complainant/opposite party no. 2 filed a complaint which was numbered as Complaint Case No. 1298 of 2008 in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua, arraying three persons as accused, which includ these two petitioners. The complainant had disclosed in the complaint petition the following facts:- I. That Plot No. 302 & 303 is complainants ancestral property and that Survey Khatiyani has till date maintained in the name of the complainants father, upon which the complainant enjoys peaceful possession. II. That in connection with the mutation of the said land an application was filed by one so called Shivdharmanand Ji, which was allowed vide Mutation Case No. 185/97-98 vide order dated 27.09.1997 passed by the Circle Officer in favour of Shivdharmanand Ji. III. That against the said order of mutation, the complainant filed an appeal vide Mutation Appeal No. 24/1997-98 before the D.C.L.R., Bhabhua. The D.C.L.R. Bhabhua quashed the order of the Circle Officer and passed orders in favour of the complainant. Against the appellate order one Ravindra Prasad Singh preferred a revision before the Collector, Kaimur vide Mutation Revision No. 21/1999-2000, which was then allowed vide order dated 27.04.2002 in favour of the revisionist Ravindra Prasad Singh. IV. That the complainant thereafter preferred a writ application vide Kripa Narain Singh vs. State of Bihar & other, C.W.J.C. No. 10720 of 2002 before the Hon'ble Patna High Court against the order passed in the Mutation Revision Case No. 21/1999-2000. The Hon'ble Patna High Court after hearing vide order dated 19.03.07 allowed the writ application filed by the complainant and set aside the order dated 27.04.2002 passed by Collector, Kaimur and remitted the matter again to Anchal Adhikari, Kaimur. The Hon'ble Patna High Court after hearing vide order dated 19.03.07 allowed the writ application filed by the complainant and set aside the order dated 27.04.2002 passed by Collector, Kaimur and remitted the matter again to Anchal Adhikari, Kaimur. V. That in terms of the aforesaid order of the Hon'ble High Court, the complainant filed a Miscellaneous Case No. 01/2007-08 before the Circle Officer, Chainpur showing that in the Hal Survey Khatiyan entries were continuing in the name of complainants father and aunt Sana Kuer. Vide order dated 26.09.2007 the Circle Officer passed an order observing that the concerned party ought to file an appeal before the competent Court. VI. That against the above order, Satyanand filed an appeal being Mutation Appeal No. 22/2007-08 Satyanand vs. Kripa Narain Singh & Others before the D.C.L.R., Bhabhua who after hearing the parties came to a finding that no documents or legal proof existed in support of any gift of land made by the family members of the complainant in favour of Accused No. 1 & 2 or any other persons connected to them. Hence the claim of Accused No. 1 & 2 or people connected to them that the land had been received in gift from complainants family is wrong and no evidence was available to support the claim of Shivdharmanand of being an heir of Atmavivekanand in whose favour the gift was allegedly made. The D.C.L.R. on the basis of order of the Apex Court A.I.R. 1980 SC 707 did not accept that Shivdharmanand Ji was heir of Atmavivekanand Ji. The D.C.L.R. held that complainant was in possession of the land in issue and that the land was a rayati land which has never been sold by complainant for which there was proof. The D.C.L.R. held that Anchal Adhikari had not satisfactorily discharged his function and setting aside the order of Anchal Adhikari dated 28.06.208 remanded the matter. Thereafter no further proceeding was initiated by Accused No. 1 & 2 nor any order was passed by Accused No. 3. VII. That a consolidation case being Case No. 1/83-84 (Shivdharmanand vs. Shyam Lal Chauhan) was filed before the Consolidation Officer, Chainpur, which concerned with Plot Nos. 304, 305, 306. The said Shivdharmanand had died in the year 1949 as would be apparent from the list submitted before the Hon'ble Apex Court of Sant Mat Bheshi Sanyasi Math Garhwaghat. VII. That a consolidation case being Case No. 1/83-84 (Shivdharmanand vs. Shyam Lal Chauhan) was filed before the Consolidation Officer, Chainpur, which concerned with Plot Nos. 304, 305, 306. The said Shivdharmanand had died in the year 1949 as would be apparent from the list submitted before the Hon'ble Apex Court of Sant Mat Bheshi Sanyasi Math Garhwaghat. Similarly a Case No. 2/83-84 was also filed before the Consolidation Officer, Chainpur (Shivdharmanand vs. Kripa Narain Singh), however no orders were passed in Case No. 2/83-84 till 22.02.1993 whereas in Case No. 1/83-84 an order was passed on 22.02.1993 itself with which the complainant had no concern. Since Shyam Lal Chouhan was the Opposite Party in Case No. 1/83-84, he preferred an appeal before Assistant Director, Consolidation Rohtas being Appeal Case No. 92/93-94. The Assistant Director, Consolidation set aside the order of the Consolidation Officer and directed for maintaining the name of the Raiyats in the Survey Khatiyan and allowed the appeal. VIII. That against the order dated 04.09.1997 passed in appeal by the Assistant Director, Consolidation Rohtas, the said Shivdharmanand filed a Revision application being Revision Case No. 349/2007 before the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna (Shivdharmanand vs. Shyam Lal Chouhan & other). After hearing by order dated 30.04.07 the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna dismissed the revision application and declared the right of Shyam Lal Chouhan. IX. That the complainant filed a Misc. Case No. 1/2007-08 before the Circle Officer, Chainpur (Accused No. 3) stating therein that in light of the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court and D.C.L.R., Bhabhua, Kaimur an order of mutation be passed in favour of complainant. Thereafter upon hearing both parties, Accused No. 3 called the complainant to his private residence on 22.09.2008 and specifically told the complainant that the property was very costly and that the opposite party was also creating a lot of pressure and since there are orders in favour of the complainant passed by the High Court and D.C.L.R., the Accused No. 3 wanted to give an order in favour of the complainant provided in lieu thereof the complainant paid Rs. 1,00,000.00 (Rupees One Lakh) as award / effort / bribe. The complainant expressed his inability to pay the amount upon which the Accused No. 3 called the complainant to meet him again the next day on 23.09.2008 after giving it careful consideration. 1,00,000.00 (Rupees One Lakh) as award / effort / bribe. The complainant expressed his inability to pay the amount upon which the Accused No. 3 called the complainant to meet him again the next day on 23.09.2008 after giving it careful consideration. X. That the complainant accordingly went to Accused No. 3 private residence situated in the Block premises on 23.09.2008 at 09:00 am along with witnesses Gopal Ji Singh, Radheshyam Singh and Ramawtar Yadav when Accused No. 3 again made a demand for money and the complainant once again expressed his inability to pay the same. In the meantime Accused No. 1 & 2 also reached there and started arguing with the complainant. Accused No. 3 started assaulting the complainant with fists and slaps and started abusing a lot. Accused No. 1 & 2 caught hold of the complainant and Accused No. 3 forcefully got signatures of complainant on 2 non judicial stamp papers and three plain papers. Accused No. 3 also took out Rs. 1100/- kept for expenditure from the pocket of the complainant. Accused No. 1 snatched a diary from the hand of the complainant which had important things noted. Accused No. 3 threatened the complainant that although the plot was complainants khatiyani land, Accused No. 3 would nonetheless pass an order in favour of Ramji Singh @ Satyanand only and complainant could see the order. XI. That the complainant then came out of the gate of Accused No. 3 and narrated the entire incident to the eye witnesses present there. Accused No. 3 in the meantime came out of his house and started abusing in the names of mother and sister of the complainant and threatened the complainant to get out of his house or else Accused No. 3 would send them to jail by calling the police. XII. That when the complainant obtained a certified copy of the order of Accused No. 3 on 30.09.2008 he found that Accused No. 3 had passed an order of mutation in favour of Accused No. 1 on the basis of order passed by Consolidation Officer in Case No. 1/83-84 although the accused persons were aware that the order passed in Consolidation Case No. 1/83-84 was not related to the complainant. Despite being in knowledge of all the accused persons of the fact that the order passed by Consolidation Officer in 1/83-84 had been set aside in Appeal by the Assistant Director, Consolidation vide order dated 04.09.97 in Case No. 92/93-94 which was also affirmed by the Director, Consolidation Bihar, Patna vide order dated 30.04.2007. The Anchal Adhikari in complete disregard and disobedience of the aforesaid orders passed by superior courts, for his selfish motives passed an order in favour of Accused No. 1 which is a brazen act of contempt. XIII. That the order passed in Case No. 1/2007-08 dated 23.09.2008 is as follows: “Record produced. All three parties present. Heard learned advocates of all three parties one by one. Written arguments have also been filed on behalf of the three parties. The arguments on behalf of the three parties have also concluded. For site inspection and evidence 10 a.m. on 24.09.2008. Put up the records on 24.10.2008.” Upon a bare perusal of the aforesaid order it would be apparent that the case had been fixed for site inspection on 24.09.2008 and the case had been adjourned to 24.10.2008 for orders. The site inspection was never done and one month prior to 24.10.2008, the date fixed for orders i.e. on 24.09.2008 itself without recalling the date, an order was passed in favour of the opposite party. Why and under what circumstances the above was done can only be explained by the Circle Officer, Chainpur. XIV. That by the time the complainant could read or got read and understood the order passed by Accused No. 3, the Court closed for Dussehra vacations from 01.10.2008 on account of which the present complaint could not be prepared and filed. XV. That the complainant claims that all accused persons with a common intention and under a conspiracy have committed fraud, forgery upon the complainant on account of which the complainant has suffered loss running into lakhs and contempt has been committed of courts and accused have gained. XVI. That the complainant had approached the concerned police station complaining about all the facts against the accused, whereupon the Officer in charge assured the complainant that he would take action upon conducting a preliminary enquiry as the matter was a serious one. XVI. That the complainant had approached the concerned police station complaining about all the facts against the accused, whereupon the Officer in charge assured the complainant that he would take action upon conducting a preliminary enquiry as the matter was a serious one. However, till date no F.I.R. has been registered and on the previous day the officer in charge refused to institute a case on the pretext that it involved an officer on account of which the complainant had to approach the court with the present complaint.” 3. In the complaint petition, it was alleged that accused persons had committed offences under Sections 341, 323, 506, 386, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 165 of the Indian Penal Code. After examination of complainant on solemn affirmation, and examining enquiry witnesses the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, which has been assailed by the petitioners in the present proceeding. However, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate was not satisfied in respect of other offences which were mentioned in the complaint petition. 4. During hearing of this petition on 7/8/2012 this court in view of the fact that litigation in between the parties was going on since long as well as the allegation of demand of illegal gratification by a public servant, who was arrayed as Accused No. 3 in the complaint petition, was of the view that such allegation was not required to be proceeded in the complaint case, but it requires investigation by a statutory investigating agency and accordingly directed the Vigilance Investigation Bureau to conduct an enquiry / investigation and submit preliminary report within a period of two months. In the meanwhile, further proceeding in Complaint Case No. 1298 of 2008 was directed to be stayed. In compliance with the order dated 7.8.2012 the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, by its letter dated 04.2.2013 submitted preliminary enquiry report, which was conducted by Deputy Superintendent of Police- cum-In-charge of the enquiry team. The Deputy Superintendent of Police had prepared the preliminary report on 31.1.2013. In compliance with the order dated 7.8.2012 the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, by its letter dated 04.2.2013 submitted preliminary enquiry report, which was conducted by Deputy Superintendent of Police- cum-In-charge of the enquiry team. The Deputy Superintendent of Police had prepared the preliminary report on 31.1.2013. It would be appropriate to incorporate the preliminary enquiry report in this order, which is quoted herein-below:- ^^mijksDr izklafxd fo"k; ds lanHkZ esa dguk gS fd bl ekeys dh tkap dk izkjaHk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; )kjk fØ0 fel0 39822@2010 Lokeh lR;kuUnth egkjkt ,oa vU; cuke fcgkj jkT; dh lquokbZ ds Øe esa fnukad 7-8-2012 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds vkyksd esa gqvk FkkA bl tkap dk;Z gsrq eq>s rFkk iq0 fu0 Jhukjk;.k flag dks tkap djus laca/kh vkns'k fn;k x;kA tkap ds Øe esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 7-8-2012 dks fuEu izdkj gS%& “In view of the nature of allegation, the court is of the opinion that it was a fit case for investigation by statutory investigating agency. In normal course, such complaint petition was required to be referred u/s. 156(3) Cr. P.C. to the police for registration of F.I.R and investigation, but in the present case, learned Magistrate has proceeded, treating the case as complaint proceeding. In all fareness, the nature of allegation warrants a direction for investigation of allegation made in complaint petition as well as the allegation leveled in between the parties, by initially conducting a preliminary enquiry and thereafter, if enquiry discloses commission of cognizable offences, in that event, FIR is required to be instituted and investigated properly. The court is of the opinion that nature of allegation can well be investigation by Vigilance Investigation Bureau Govt. of Bihar. The court is of the opinion that nature of allegation can well be investigation by Vigilance Investigation Bureau Govt. of Bihar. The court is of the opinion that nature of allegation can well be investigation by Vigilance Investigation Bureau Govt. of Bihar. While conducting enquiry / investigation the investigating agency may also enquire the conduct of the complaint, besides examining the role of accused person made in complaint petition.” Tkkap ds Øe esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds vkns'k esa mYysf[kr fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z;kstuk rS;kj djrs gq, tkap dk;Z izkjaHk fd;k x;k rFkk eq[; :i ls bl gsrq fuEukafdr fcUnq fu/kkZfjr fd;s x;s%& 1- D;k vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj ds }kjk nkf[ky [kkfjt ds ,ot esa 1 yk[k :i;s dh ekax ifjoknh Jh —ikukjk;.k flag ls dh x;h Fkh \ 2- D;k vkjksih vapykf/kdkjh ds }kjk vius ljdkjh vkokl ij ifjoknh ds lkFk ekjihV dh ?kVuk dkfjr dh x;h Fkh ,oa ifjoknh ds ikl ls Mk;jh ,oa iSlk fNuk x;k Fkk \ 3- ifjoknh ,oa cuk;s x;s vfHk;qDrksa ds chp fookn dk D;k dkj.k FkkA 4- ifjoknh ds fØ;kdyki dh tkapA mijksDr ds vykok tkap ds Øe esa ekeys dh i`"BHkwfe rFkk vU; lacaf/kr fcUnqvksa dk voyksdu fd;kA uanuk xkao ,oa vklikl ds yksxksa dk c;ku fy;k ftlesa ik;k fd & ¼1½ —ikukjk;.k flag ,oa eB esa jgus okys egkRekvksa ds chp dkQh igys ls eB dh tehu dks ysdj fookn pyk vk jgk gSA iwoZ esa Hkh tc ,d ckj eB dh tehu dk nkf[ky [kkfjt eB ds i{k esa fd;k x;k Fkk] ml le; Hkh —ikukjk;.k flag ds }kjk o"kZ 1997&98 esa eq[; U;kf;d n.Mkf/kdkjh dSewj ds ;gkW rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj ,oa vU; ds fo#) ifjokn la0 581@1997&98 nk;j fd;k x;k FkkA ¼2½ yksxksa ds crk;s vuqlkj Jh —ikukjk;.k flag ds firkth Lo0 izHkq ukjk;.k flag dks dksbZ larku ugha gksrh Fkh bl dkj.k larku izkfIr ds fy, J)ko’k mUgksaus 54 fM0 tehu eB dks ekSf[kd :i ls nku esa ns fn;k FkkA mlh le; eB ds izfr J)k j[kus okys J)kyqvksa ,oa eB ds egkRekvksa ds }kjk ml tehu ij eB dk fuekZ.k fd;k x;kA tc Jh —ik ukjk;.k flag us gks'k laHkkyk rc ls gh eB dh tehu tks buds iwoZtksa ds }kjk ekSf[kd :i ls eB dks nku ns nh x;h Fkh] mls ikus dk iz;kl 'kq: dj fn;sA blh tehu dks ysdj yxkrkj fookn pyk vk jgk gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd mijksDr fØ0 fel0 & 39822@2010 eq[; U;kf;d n.Mkf/kdkjh dSewj ds fnukad 18-1-2010 dks ifjokn la0- & 1298@08 esa ikfjr vkns’k dks [kkfjt djus gsrq nk;j fd;k x;k FkkA ftlesa ifjoknh —ik ukjk;.k flag }kjk ;g vkjksi yxk;k x;k Fkk fd ifjokn of.kZr vfHk;qDr ua0 & 3 ¼vapykf/kdkjh blh tehu dks ysdj yxkrkj fookn pyk vk jgk gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd mijksDr fØ0 fel0 & 39822@2010 eq[; U;kf;d n.Mkf/kdkjh dSewj ds fnukad 18-1-2010 dks ifjokn la0- & 1298@08 esa ikfjr vkns’k dks [kkfjt djus gsrq nk;j fd;k x;k FkkA ftlesa ifjoknh —ik ukjk;.k flag }kjk ;g vkjksi yxk;k x;k Fkk fd ifjokn of.kZr vfHk;qDr ua0 & 3 ¼vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj½ ds }kjk [ksljk ua0 & 302 ,oa 303 ds nkf[ky [kkfjt ds fy, fj'or ds :i esa 1 yk[k :i;s dh ekax dh x;h Fkh ,oa bl lanHkZ esa ifjoknh dks vius ljdkjh vkokl ij cqyk;k FkkA ogkW tkus ij ifjoknh ds lkFk vfHk;qDr ua0 & 03 ¼vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku½ ds }kjk ekjihV dh x;h ,oa mulsa dqN iSls vkSj Mk;jh Nhu fy;kA mDr ifjokn la0 & 1298@2008 esa ifjoknh }kjk yxk;s x;s vkjksiksa ,oa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k ds vkyksd esa mi;qZDr of.kZr fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij tkap dh x;hA ifjokn esa of.kZr ?kVukLFky ¼vapykf/kdkjh] pSuiqj dk ljdkjh vkokl½ dk fujh{k.k fd;kA ?kVukLFky iz[kaM dk;kZy; ls if'pe ¼rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh dk vkokl½ yxHkx 50 ehVj dh nwjh ij vofLFkr gSa] ftlesa orZeku esa iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh] pSuiqj dk vkokl gSA blh ljdkjh vkokl esa vkjksih vapykf/kdkjh pSuuqj eks0 fjtoku ds jgus dh ,oa ?kVuk dkfjr djus dh ckr ifjoknh ,oa vU; ds }kjk crk;h x;hA ml le; iz[kaM esa vapy vf/kdkjh ,oa iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh ds :i esa ,d gh inkf/kdkjh vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku inLFkkfir FksA vkokl iDdk gS rFkk nf{k.k :[k dk gSA pkjksa rjQ ls pgkjnhokjh gSA blds mRrj esa ljdkjh [kkyh tehu ds ckn fdlku Hkou] tks ckn esa cuk gSA nf{k.k esa xsV ls lVs dPph lM+d iwjCk if'pe yackbZ esa] tks vkxs izkFkfed lokLF; dsUnz dh vksj tkrh gSA iwjc esa ljdkjh ijrh tehu ds ckn iz[kaM dk vU; ljdkjh vkokl gS] ftlesa ukthj jgrs gSaA if'pe esa ljdkjh tehu gSA ?kVukLFky ds utjh uD'kk fuEuor gS%& tkap ds Øe esa ifjoknh Jh —ik ukjk;.k flag] mez 60 o”kZ] is0 Lo0 izHkq ukjk;.k flag] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk ¼dSewj½ dk c;ku iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh] pSuiqj ds dk;kZy; esa mudh mifLFkfr esa fy;kA bUgksus vius c;ku esa crk;k fd fnukad 23-9-2008 dks izkr% 8 ls 9 cts ds chp vius xzkehu xksikyth flag] jk/ks';ke flag ,oa jkevorkj ;kno ds lkFk rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku ds vkokl ij x;sA vius lkFk vk;s O;fDr;ksa dks vkokl ds esu xsV & HkHkqvk ¼dSewj½ dk c;ku iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh] pSuiqj ds dk;kZy; esa mudh mifLFkfr esa fy;kA bUgksus vius c;ku esa crk;k fd fnukad 23-9-2008 dks izkr% 8 ls 9 cts ds chp vius xzkehu xksikyth flag] jk/ks';ke flag ,oa jkevorkj ;kno ds lkFk rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku ds vkokl ij x;sA vius lkFk vk;s O;fDr;ksa dks vkokl ds esu xsV ds ckgj lM+d ij gh NksM+dj ;s vdsys vapykf/kdkjh ds vkokl esa x;s rFkk cjkenk ds lVs if'pe okys dejs esa vapykf/kdkjh ds lkFk cSB x;s A yxHkx 10 feuV ds ckn csn izdk'kkuan] lR;kuanth Hkh vapykf/kdkjh ds ikl vk;sA osn izdk'kkuanth cksys fd D;k {kerk gS fd ;s vkMZj djk ysxkA bl ij ;s cksys fd esjk dkxtkr lgh gS D;ksa vkMZj ugha gksxkA blh ckr ij buds rFkk csnkuan izdk'kth ds lkFk cd>d gks x;h rFkk lh0vks0 lkgc izfroknh ds lkFk gks x;s vkSj ekW] Ckgu dks xkyh xykSt djus yxsA fQj lh0vks0 lkgc buij FkIij pyk fn;s rFkk rS'k esa vkdj osnkuan izdk'k rFkk lR;kuan nksuksa O;fDr ,d&,d ckWg idM+ fy;sA blh chp lh0vks0 lkgc 02 uutqfMl;y LVkai ij ,oa 3 lknk dkxt ij esjk gLRkk{kj djk;saA buds gkFk esa ,d ilZuy Mk;jh Fkk , ftls lR;kuan th ys fy;sA vkjksih rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku buds mijh ikWdsV ls 1100@& :0 ¼,d gtkj ,d lkS½ fudky fy;sA blds ckn nksuksa O;fDr bugsa NksM+ fn;s A rc ;s ckgj fudys rks pgkjnhokjh ds ckgj xsV ij lkFk vk;sa xzkeh.k feys rks os bl ?kVuk ds ckjs esa mu yksxksa dks crk;sA blh chp lh0vks0 lkgc ckgj fudys rFkk cksys fd Hkkxs ugha rks iqfyl dks cqyk nsaxsaA blds ckn djhc ,d Ms<+ ?kaVs ckns ;s pSuiqj Fkkuk ij tkdj fyf[kr vkosnu fn;sA tc Fkkuk esa eqdnek ntZ ugha gqvk rks HkHkqvk U;k;ky; esa tkdj eqdnek ntZ djk;sA tc buls Fkkuk esa fn;s fyf[kr vkosnu dh izkfIr vkfn ds ckjs esa ekaxk rks bUgksaus crk;k fd ,slk dqN Hkh buds ikl ugha gSA xokg ykyth flag] mez 60 o"kZ] is0 cspw izlkn flag] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd ifjoknh ds lkFk gh gSA ;s vius c;ku esa crk;s fd fnukad 22- 9-2008 dks la/;k esa ;s jk/ks';ke flag rFkk jkevorkj ;kno njokts ij cSBdj xi’ki dj jgsa FksA mlh le; —ikukjk;.kflag vk;s rFkk crk;s fd eksVs'ku okys QSlys esa vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku buls 01 yk[k :i;s dh ftyk & HkHkqvk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd ifjoknh ds lkFk gh gSA ;s vius c;ku esa crk;s fd fnukad 22- 9-2008 dks la/;k esa ;s jk/ks';ke flag rFkk jkevorkj ;kno njokts ij cSBdj xi’ki dj jgsa FksA mlh le; —ikukjk;.kflag vk;s rFkk crk;s fd eksVs'ku okys QSlys esa vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku buls 01 yk[k :i;s dh ekax dj jgsa gSA vki yksx tkurs gS fd gekjh iSr`d tehu gSA tjk lk muls ¼vapykf/kdkjh ls½ cksy fnft;sxk ;g lgh dke gS —ikukjk;.k flag ls iSlk ugha ekaxk tk;sA bl ij ;s cksys fd pfy;s ge yksx lh0vks0 lkgc ls cksysaxsA ekus ;k ugha ekus nokc ugha ns ldrs gSa A nwljs fnu 23-9-2008 dks ;s vU; nksuksa O;fDr ,oa —ikuan flag lh0vks0 lkgc ds vkokl ij djhc 8&9 cts lqcg vk;sA —ik ukjk;.k flag bu rhuksa O;fDr;ksa dks xsV ij jksd fn;s rFkk ;s pgkjnhokjh ds Hkhrj pys x;sA cksys fd dgus ij vk;sxkA tc lh0vks0 lkgc —ik ukjk;.k flag ds chp okn fookn gks jgk blh chp lR;kuan vkSj osnizdk'k vkaun Hkh lh0vks0 lkgc ds vkokl ds vanj x;sA lh0vks0 lkgc eks0 fjtoku ,oa —ik ukjk;.k flag ds chp ckrkckrh gks jgh Fkh] ;s lqusaA xsV ij ls gh f[kM+dh ls ns[ks fd lh0vks lkgc —ikukjk;.k flag ds mij FkIij pyk;s rFkk osnizdk'kuan ,oa lR;kuan —ikukjk;.k flag dk nksuksa gkFk idM+ fy;sA rc ge rhuksa O;fDr vanj ?kql x;s rFkk cjkenk ij f[kM+dh ds ikl [kMs gks x;sA ns[ks fd —ik ukjk;.k flag dh Mk;jh lR;kuan ys fy;s ,oa lh0vks0 lkgc 4&5 dkxt yk;s vkSj lHkh dkxt ij tcju —ik ukjk;.k dk nLr[kr ys fy;sA lh0vks0 —ikukjk;.k flag ds mij ds ikWdsV ls iSlk fudky fy, rFkk d`ikukjk;.k flag dks cksys fd ;gkW ls Hkkxks rc ckgj fudydj ?kVuk ds ckjs esa crk;sA ;s vkxs crk;s fd tc ;s yksx xsV dh rjQ /khjs /khjs c<+ jgsa Fks rFkk vk/kk nwjh ij vkdj :d x;s rc d`ikuan flag vk x;sA lHkh ,d lkFk pgkjnhokjh ds xsV ls ckgj fudysaA tc ifjlj esa vk/kk nwjh r; fd;s Fks rHkh lh0vks0 lkgc cjkenk ij fudys rFkk cksys fd ckgj fudyks ugha rks iqfyl cqyk nsaxs A mlds ckn —ikuan flag Fkkuk pys x;s rFkk ;s rhuksa cl idM+dj ?kj pys x;sA xokg jk/ks';ke flag] mez 48 o"kZ is0 c`t fcgkjh flag] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA bUgksaus crk;k fd yxHkx Fks rHkh lh0vks0 lkgc cjkenk ij fudys rFkk cksys fd ckgj fudyks ugha rks iqfyl cqyk nsaxs A mlds ckn —ikuan flag Fkkuk pys x;s rFkk ;s rhuksa cl idM+dj ?kj pys x;sA xokg jk/ks';ke flag] mez 48 o"kZ is0 c`t fcgkjh flag] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA bUgksaus crk;k fd yxHkx 4 o"kZ iwoZ dh ?kVuk gS frfFk] le; rFkk o"kZ ;kn ugha gSA xksikyth flag ds njoktk ij ;s xksikyth flag cSBdj ckr dj jgsa FksA rHkh d`ikukjk;.k flag rFkk jkevorkj ;kno vk; x;sA —ikukjk;.k flag cksys fd lh0vks0 pSuiqj ¼uke ugha ekywe½ nkf[ky [kfjt ds fy;s 1 yk[k :i;s ?kwl ekax jgsa gSA xksiky flag cksys fd dy pydj lh0vks0 lkgc ls pyk tk;sxk fd ,slk er dhft;s rc ge pkjksa vkneh lh0vks0 pSuiqj ds ljdkjh vkokl ij vk;sA —ikukjk;.k flag ge yksaxksa dks xsV ij gh ckgj NksM+dj vkokl esa pys x;sA dqN nsj ds ckn Hkhrj ls xkyh xykSt dk vkokt xsV ij lqukbZ fn;k] rks geyksx xsV ds vanj tkdj cjkenk ij f[kM+dh fudV [kM+k gks x;sA mlh le; lR;kuan ,ao osnizdk'kuan vk x;sA lh0vks0 lkgc cksys fd iSlk ugha fn;k blfy;s rqEgkjs uke ls nkf[ky [kkfjt ugha djsaxsa rFkk rqEgkjs ,aVh ikVhZ ds i{k esa djsaxsaA bl ij —ikukjk;.k flag cksys fd ,slk ugha dhft;s ugha rks Bhd ughsa gksxkA rc lh0vks0 lkgc —ikukjk;.k flag ij FkIij pyk;sA rc osnizdk'kuan —ikukjk;.k flag dks idM+ fy;s rFkk lR;kuanth —ikukjk;.k flag ds gkFk ls Mk;jh fNu fy;s lh0vks0 lkgc LVkai isij ij ,oa lknk dkxt ij —ikukjk;.k flag ls gLrk{kj djk;saA blds ckn lh0vks0 lkgc —ik ukjk;.k flag ds mijh ikWdsV esa gkFk Mkys ysfdu dqN fy;s fd ugha fy;s ;s ugha ns[ksaA —ik ukjk;.k flag ckgj vkus ij cksys fd 1100@& : lh0vks0 lkgc ys fy;sA fQj lh0vks0 lkgc cjkenk ij fudydj cksys fd Hkkx tkvks ugha rks iqfyl cqykdj can djk nsaxsA fQj ;s yksx ckgj fudy x;sA ;s xksikyth flag cl ls ?kj pys x;sA rFkk —ikukjk;.k flag Fkkuk pys x;sA ;s crk;s fd eB okyh tehu dh nkf[ky [kfjt dks ysdj ;s ?kVuk ?kVh gSA xokg jkevorkj flag ;kno] mez 30&32 o"kZ] is0 Lo0 f>ujnso flag ;kno] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk dk c;ku fy;kA bUgksaus vius c;ku esa crk;k fd ?kVuk 4 o"kZ igys dh gS frfFk] le;] o"kZ ;kn ugha gSA ,d jkst ;s xksikyth flag ds eB okyh tehu dh nkf[ky [kfjt dks ysdj ;s ?kVuk ?kVh gSA xokg jkevorkj flag ;kno] mez 30&32 o"kZ] is0 Lo0 f>ujnso flag ;kno] xzke & uanuk] Fkkuk & pSuiqj] ftyk & HkHkqvk dk c;ku fy;kA bUgksaus vius c;ku esa crk;k fd ?kVuk 4 o"kZ igys dh gS frfFk] le;] o"kZ ;kn ugha gSA ,d jkst ;s xksikyth flag ds njoktk ij la/;k esa jk/ks';ke flag rFkk xksikyth flag ds lkFk cSBs FksA blh chp —ikukjk;.k flag vk;s rFkk cksys fd lh0vks0 pSuuqj ds ;gkW x;s FksA tehu laca/kh dkxt iVuk ls vk;k gSA mlesa lh0vks0 lkgc dks QSlyk lqukuk gSA QSlyk ds fy, dqN iSlk@eqnzk dh ekax fd;s gSA cksys fd iVuk ls vkidk tehu dk fMxzh gks x;k gSA mlh vk/kkj ij eq>s Hkh QSlyk lqukuk gSA blds fy, lh0vks0 lkgc 1 yk[k :i;k dk ekax fd;s gSA —ikukjk;.k flag iSlk nsus esa vleFkZrk izdV fd;sA cksys fd esjk tehu Hkh] QSlyk Hkh esjs i{k esa vkSj iSlk Hkh geh ns \ iSlk ugha nwaxkA lqcg vki yksx Hkh esjs lkFk pfy;s ge pkjksa vkneh lqcg es djhc 8&9 cts lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ds ljdkjh vkokl ij vk;sA ge pkjksa vkneh Hkhrj x;s rks lh0vks0 lqcg cjkenk ij ckgj fudydj cksys fd —ikukjk;.k flag vki vkb;s ckdh lHkh dks ckgj [kM+k jgus fnft;s] ge rhuksa vkneh esu xsV ds ikl [kM+k gks x;sA —ikukjk;.k flag Hkhrj pys x;s rFkk lh0vks0 lkgc ds lkFk ckr djus yxsA blh chp nks O;fDr lR;kuan mQZ jketh flag ,oa osnizdk'kuan lh0vks0 lkgc ds vkokl esa izos'k fd;sA bu yksxksa dks igqWprs gh lh0vks lkgc ,oa —ikukjk;.k flag dM+k vkokt esa ckr djus yxsA vkokt lqudj ge lHkh Hkh vanj izos'k fd;s rFkk cjkenk ij f[kM+dh ,oa njoktk ds ikl [kM+k gks x;sA ns[ksa fd osn izdk’kkuan —ik ukjk;.k flag ds gkFk idM+s Fks rFkk lh0vks0 lkgc muij FkIij rkus FksA jketh flag d`ikukjk;.k flag ds gkFk ls ,d Mk;jh fNu fy;sA lh0vks0 lkgc ,oa lR;kuan LVkai isij ,oa lknk dkxt ij —ik ukjk;.k flag ls gLrk{kj djk jgs FksA gLrk{kj djkus ds ckn lh0vks lkgc —ikuk;.k flag dks ckgj Hkxk fn;sA ckgj tc —ikukjk;.k flga vk;s rks dgus yxs fd vki yksx ns[ks fd esjs lkFk T;knrh gqbZ iSlk ugha nsus dk ;gh naM feyk gSA blds ckn lh0vks lkgc :e ls ckgj fudys vkSj rerekdj cksys fd 'kkys Hkkx tkvksa fd ;gkW ij iapk;r djkus vk;s gksaA vHkh iqfyl dks ds ckn lh0vks lkgc —ikuk;.k flag dks ckgj Hkxk fn;sA ckgj tc —ikukjk;.k flga vk;s rks dgus yxs fd vki yksx ns[ks fd esjs lkFk T;knrh gqbZ iSlk ugha nsus dk ;gh naM feyk gSA blds ckn lh0vks lkgc :e ls ckgj fudys vkSj rerekdj cksys fd 'kkys Hkkx tkvksa fd ;gkW ij iapk;r djkus vk;s gksaA vHkh iqfyl dks cqykrk gwWA blh ij ge pkjksa vkneh ckgj fudy x;sA —ikukjk;.k flag Fkkuk tkus dh ckr crkdj pys x;s rFkk ;s lkbZfdy ls ?kj ykSV x;s ckdh yksx cl ls pys x;sA c;ku i<+us ds ckn ;s crk;s fd d`ikukjk;.k flag crk;s Fks fd lh0vks0 lkgc buds ikWdsV ls 1100@& :0 fudky fy;s Fks ijarq ;s ugha ns[ks FksA rRdkyhu lh0vks0 eks0 fjtoku ds izkbosV pkyd eks0 eq'rkd] mez 30 o"kZ] firk & uquw vgalkjh] Lkk0 pSuiqj] ftyk HkHkqvk dk c;ku fy;k A bUgksaus vius c;ku esa crk;k fd ;s rr0 lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ds izkbZosV pkyd FksA rFkk lh0vks0 lkgc ds vkokl esa gh jgrs Fksa A pwfd mudk ifjokj lkFk esa ugha jgrk FkkA o"kZ 2008 esa lh0vks0 lkgc ds vkokl esa lh0vks0 lkgc rFkk —ikuk;.k flag xzke uanuk ds chp fdlh izdkj dh ?kVuk ugha /kVh FkhA cfYd eB ds tehu dk fookn dks ysdj dbZ ckj uanuk xkao tkdj lh0vks0 lkgc tkap iM+rky fd;sA —ik ukjk;.k flag ,oa uanuk eB ds egkRekvksa ds chp tehu nkf[ky [kkfjt dks ysdj dkQh iwoZ ls fookn py jgk gSA blh fookn dks ysdj —ik ukjk;.k flag rr0 vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku ds fo:) >wBk dsl dkVZ esa tkdj fd;s gSA iz[kaM dk;kZy; pSuiqj ds bnZ fxnZ jgus okys dqN O;fDr;ksa dk c;ku Lora= xokg ds :i esa fy;k x;k gS tks fuEuor gS%& xokg uFkquh jke , mez 40 o"kZ , orZeku eqf[k;k enqjuk , iz[kaM pSuiqj , ftyk HkHkqvk dk c;ku iz[kaM dk;kZy; pSuiqj esa fy;kA bUgksaus vius c;ku esa cryk;k fd ;s o"kZ 2008 esa Hkh blh xzkeiapk;r ds eqf[k;k Fks rFkk orZeku esa gSaA uanuk xzke bUgha fd iapk;r esa gSA ml xkao ds —ikukjk;.k flag ,oa uanuk dqfV;k ¼eB ½ dh tehu ds fookn dh tkudkjh gSA o"kZ 2008 esa eks0 fjtoku vapykf/kdkjh lg iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh pSuiqj ds :i esa inLFkfir FksA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; iVuk ds vkns'k ds vkyksd esa eks0 fjtoku vapykf/kdkjh pSuuqj }kjk nfk[ky [kkfjt eB ds i{k esa dj fn;sA vapykf/kdkjh ds cqykus ij ;s ,d ckj o"kZ 2008 esa ,oa uanuk dqfV;k ¼eB ½ dh tehu ds fookn dh tkudkjh gSA o"kZ 2008 esa eks0 fjtoku vapykf/kdkjh lg iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh pSuiqj ds :i esa inLFkfir FksA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; iVuk ds vkns'k ds vkyksd esa eks0 fjtoku vapykf/kdkjh pSuuqj }kjk nfk[ky [kkfjt eB ds i{k esa dj fn;sA vapykf/kdkjh ds cqykus ij ;s ,d ckj o"kZ 2008 esa uanuk xkao ds yksxksa ds lkFk eB ds cxy esa tkap ds fy;s x;s FksA xkao ds yksx crk;s fd eB o"kZ 1940 & 45 esa cuk FkkA buds iwoZt crkrs gS fd eB dk fuekZ.k egkRek yksx gh fd;s FksA 8 &10 egkRek ogkW ges'kk jgrs FksA vHkh Hkh izR;sd eaxyokjh ds jkst Hktu fdrZu gksrk gS ftlesa vxy cxy ds 150 & 200 vkneh [kuk [kkrs gSA xkWo ds yksx vHkh Hkh dqN u dqN vukt ysdj eB vkrs gS vkjrh oxSjg Hkh gksrk gSA vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku tc eB ds tehu dk nkf[ky [kfjt eB ds i{k esa dksVZ ds vkns'k ds vkyksd esa dj fn;s rc —ikukjk;.k flag ,d >wBk eqdnek rr0 vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ,oa eB ds egkRek yksxksa ds fo:) dksVZ esa tkdj o"kZ 2008 esa dj fn;s Fks tcfd muds vkokl ij fdlh izkdj dh ?kVuk ugha ?kVh FkhA xokg egsUnz flag mez 40 o"kZ firk Jh gfj flag , xzke nqcsdslfj;k , Fkkuk pSuiqj , ftyk HkHkqvk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd uanuk eB dk fuekZ.k buds tUe ds iwoZ dk gSA ;s izk;% pSuiqj vkrs tkrs FksA o"kZ 2008 esa eks0 fjtoku vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj rFkk iz[kaM fodkl inkf/kdkjh ds Hkh izHkkj esa FksA muds dk;kZdky esa ;s vapykf/kdkjh eks0 fjtoku ds }kjk vU; fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ ?kVuk djus ds laca/k esa dHkh dqN ugha lqusA vxj fdlh inkf/kdkjh ;k dehZ }kjk dksbZ ?kVuk dh x;h gksrh rks ;g fuf'pr :i ls tkudkjh gksrhA xokg v:.k dqekj ikaMs mQZ vIiw ikaMs , mez 40 o"kZ is0 ykyth ikaM , xzke >xfj;k , Fkkuk pSuiqj , ftyk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA crk;s fd —ik ukjk;.k flag xzke uanuk ds lkFk uanuk eB ds tehu dk fookn py jgk gSA bldh tkudkjh rc gqbZ tc lh0vks0 pSuiqj ds dk;kZy; esa nksuksa i{k ds odhy vkdj viuk viuk i{k j[krs FksA budk ?kj iz[kaM dk;kZy; ds mRrj if'pe dksuk ij yxHkx 500 ehVj dh nwjh ij gSA o"kZ 2008 esa budh HkkHkks izfrHkk nsoh eqf[k;k FkhA bl dkj.k Hkh budk ds lkFk uanuk eB ds tehu dk fookn py jgk gSA bldh tkudkjh rc gqbZ tc lh0vks0 pSuiqj ds dk;kZy; esa nksuksa i{k ds odhy vkdj viuk viuk i{k j[krs FksA budk ?kj iz[kaM dk;kZy; ds mRrj if'pe dksuk ij yxHkx 500 ehVj dh nwjh ij gSA o"kZ 2008 esa budh HkkHkks izfrHkk nsoh eqf[k;k FkhA bl dkj.k Hkh budk CykSd esa vkuk tkuk dkQh gksrk FkkA lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku o"kZ 2008 esa ;gkW inLFkkfir FksA mUgha ds le; esa uanuk eB dh tehu dk fookn py jgk FkkA o"kZ 2008 esa lh0vks0 lkgc rFkk —ik ukjk;.k flag xzke uanuk ds chp ekjihV dh dksbZ ?kVuk ugha ?kVh FkhA pSuiqj NksVh txg gksus ds dkj.k NksVh&NksVh ?kVuk,a rqjr izdk'k esa vk tkrh gSA bUgsa tkudkjh gS fd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds vkn'k ds vkyksd esa ;g eB okyh tehu dk nkf[ky [kfjt eB ds i{k esa gks x;kA rc —ikukjk;.k flag false dsl dksVZ esa tkdj dj fn;sA tcfd lh0vks0 pSuiqj ds vkokl esa dksbZ ?kVk ugha ?kVh gSA cq<+s cqtqxZ yksx crkrs gS fd eB dk Hkou 1940 & 45 esa gh cuk gSA —ik ukjk;.k flag ds firk Hkh 54 fM0 tehu eB ds fy, ekSf[kd :i ls nku esa fn;s FksA gks'k laHkkyus ls gh ns[k jgsa gS fd ml tehu ij eB dk gh dCtk gSA xokg eks0 fQjkst [kku , firk 'kehe [kku , lk0 fljfoV , Fkkuk pSuij fty dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd rr0 lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ,oa uanuk xkao ds chp ekjihV ds ?kVuk ls lacaf/kr tkudkjh vkt feyh gSA tc fd ;g ?kVuk crk;h tk jgh gS ml le; ;s xzke iapk;r fljfoV iapk;r ds eqf[k;k FksA vkSj pSuiqj iz[kaM dk;kZy; cjkcj vkrs tkrs FksA bl pht dh bUgsa tkudkjh gS fd uanuk xzke ds eB dh tehu dks ysdj d`ik ukjk;.k flag ,oa eB ds chp fookn py jgk gSA d`ikukjk;.k flag ds dksVZ ifjokn i= esa crk;k x;k ?kVuk ugha ?kVh gSA xokg t; izdk'k ;kno mez 38 o"kZ firk Jh jkek/kkj flag ;kno , Lkk0 yksgjk , Fkkuk pSuiqj ftyk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd rr0 lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ,oa uanuk xzke ds d`ikukjk;.k flag ds chp ekjihV dh ?kVuk dh tkudkjh vkt gqbZ gSA d`ik ukjk;.k flag }kjk dksVZ ifjokn i= esa tksa ?kVuk fn[kk;k x;k gS , bl izdkj dh dksbZ ?kVuk ugha ?kVh gSA ;s crk;s fd bUgsa Lkk0 yksgjk , Fkkuk pSuiqj ftyk dSewj dk c;ku fy;kA ;s crk;s fd rr0 lh0vks0 pSuiqj eks0 fjtoku ,oa uanuk xzke ds d`ikukjk;.k flag ds chp ekjihV dh ?kVuk dh tkudkjh vkt gqbZ gSA d`ik ukjk;.k flag }kjk dksVZ ifjokn i= esa tksa ?kVuk fn[kk;k x;k gS , bl izdkj dh dksbZ ?kVuk ugha ?kVh gSA ;s crk;s fd bUgsa ;g tkudkjh gS fd uanuk xkao dh eB okyh tehu dks ysdj d`ikukjk;.k flag ,oa eB ds egkRekvks ds chp dkQh le; ls fookn pyrk vk jgk gSA ysfdu dHkh Hkh lh0vks0 lkgc rFkk d`ikukjk;.k flag ds chp ekjihV dh ?kVuk ds ckjs esa ugha lqukA iz[kaM dk;kZy; , pSuiqj esa ifjoknh Jh d`ik ukjk;.k flag ,oa vU; xokgksa dk c;ku ysus ds i'pkr ;g rF; mHkjdj lkeusa vk;k fd Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ,oa uanuk eB ds chp tehu dks ysdj iqjkuk fookn pyk vk jgk gSA vr% vxzrj tkap gsrq uanuk eB igwWpk ,oa vklikl ds yksxksa dk c;ku fy;kA tkap ds Øe esa Jh dkfydk mik/;k; mez 70 o"kZ , is0 Lo0 /kqjh mik/;k; xzke pSuiqj , txnh’k 'kekZ mez 38 o"kZ is0 Lo0 cnjh flag xzke uanuk , Jh ykyckcw flag mez 54 o"kZ is0 Lo0 cStukFk flag lk0 uanuk , eksgu feJ mez 54 o"kZ is0 Jh m)o feJ lk0 fuch , Fkkuk pkWn , Jh jketh flag mez 55 o"kZ is0 Lo0 ccu flag lk0 vljsQ , Fkkuk pkan , Jh fnxkm jke , mez 45 o"kZ is0 Lo0 /kqjQsdu jke, lk0 uanuk , Jh ikjlukFk jke , mez 55 o"kZ is0 jkenso jke , xzke uanuk Jh Hkxoku ;kno , mez 40 o"kZ is0 Lo0 jkelqUnj ;kno , lk0 uanuk , Jh mtkxhj jke mez 50&52 o"kZ , is0 Mksekjke lk0 uanuk vkfn dk c;ku fy;kA buyksxksa us vius vius c;ku esa crk;k fd ;g eB dkQh iqjkuk gSA yxHkx o"kZ 1940 & 45 ds chp eB ds fuekZ.k lsa lacaf/kr dk;Z gq;s FksA buyksxksa us vkxs ;g Hkh crk;k fd tc ls buyksxksa us gks'k laHkkyk gS rc ls gh bl eB dks bl txg ns[kk gS ,oa ;gkW lRlax gksrs gq, ns[kk gSA eB ls lacaf/kr tehu ds ckjs esa iwNus ij yky ckcw flag , eksgu feJ , jketh flag vkfn us crk;k fd buyksaxksa us lquk gS fd Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ds firkth Lo0 izHkq ukjk;.k flag dks dksbZ larku ugha gksrh Fkh , bl dkj.k larku izkfIr ds fy, bl txg ns[kk gS ,oa ;gkW lRlax gksrs gq, ns[kk gSA eB ls lacaf/kr tehu ds ckjs esa iwNus ij yky ckcw flag , eksgu feJ , jketh flag vkfn us crk;k fd buyksaxksa us lquk gS fd Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ds firkth Lo0 izHkq ukjk;.k flag dks dksbZ larku ugha gksrh Fkh , bl dkj.k larku izkfIr ds fy, J)ko'k mUgksaus 54 fM0 tehu eB dks ekSf[kd :i ls nku esa ns fn;k FkkA tkap ds Øe esa uanuk xkao ds yksxksa ls tc iwNrkN dh x;h rks muyksxksa us crk;k fd d`ikukjk;.k flag ,oa eB esa jgusokys egkRekvksa ds chp dkQh igys ls eB dh tehu dks ysdj fookn pyk vk jgk gSA vkxs muyksaxksa us crk;k fd lqurs gS fd iwoZ esa Hkh tc ,d ckj eB dh tehu dk nkf[ky [kkfjt eB ds i{k esa fd;k x;k Fkk , ml le; Hkh d`ikukjk;.k flag ds }kjk o"kZ 1997 & 98 esa eq[; U;kf;d n.Mkf/kdkjh , dSewj ds ;gkW rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh , pSuiqj ds fo:) ifjokn la0 & 581 @ 1997 &98 nk;j fd;k x;k Fkk , tks laHkor% [kkfjt gks x;k FkkA ?kVukLFky ds fujh{k.k , complaint case ua0 & 1298 @ 2008 ds ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ,oa buds }kjk cuk;s x;s xokgksa , ?kVuk LFky ds vklikl ds Lora= xokgksa ds c;ku ls fuEu rF; izdk'k esa vk;s gS%& 1& ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag }kjk complaint case ua0 & 1298 @ 2008 esa yxk;s x;s vkjksi ds fy, dksbZ vfHkys[kh; lk{; miyC/k ugha gS vkSj u gh ekaxus ij ifjoknh ds }kjk tkap ds Øe esa miyC/k djk;s x;saA 2 & yxk;s x;s vkjksi ds leFkZu esa dsoy ifjoknh Jh d`ik ukjk;.k flag }kjk gh ekSf[kd c;ku fn;k x;kA 3& fj'or dh jkf'k ekaxs tkus ds laca/k esa iwNus ij complaint case ua0 & 1298 @2008 esa ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag }kjk cuk;s x;s vU; rhu xokgksa us Hkh dsoy bruk crk;k fd mUgsa ifjoknh ds }kjk bl ckr dh tkudkjh feyh fd vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj ds }kjk nkf[ky [kkfjt ds fy, 01 yk[k :i;s dh jde fj'or ds rkSj ij ekaxh x;h gSA bl dkj.k d`ik ukjk;.k flag ds xokgksa ds c;ku dks izekf.kd ugha ekuk tk ldrk D;ksafd mUgsa ifjoknh ls gh fj'or ekWxs tkus dh lwpuk feyh Fkh os Lo;a ugha lqus FksA 4& bruk gh ugha ifjoknh ds }kjk fyf[kr :i esa ;g crk;k x;k gS fd tc ;s vapykf/kdkjh ds dh jde fj'or ds rkSj ij ekaxh x;h gSA bl dkj.k d`ik ukjk;.k flag ds xokgksa ds c;ku dks izekf.kd ugha ekuk tk ldrk D;ksafd mUgsa ifjoknh ls gh fj'or ekWxs tkus dh lwpuk feyh Fkh os Lo;a ugha lqus FksA 4& bruk gh ugha ifjoknh ds }kjk fyf[kr :i esa ;g crk;k x;k gS fd tc ;s vapykf/kdkjh ds vkokl ds vanj tk jgs Fks rks vius lkFk vk;s rhuksa yksxksa dks izos'k }kj ds ckgj gh lM+d ij NksM+ fn;k Fkk vkSj vkokl ls ckgj vkus ds i'pkr muyksxksa dks vius lkFk ?kfVr ?kVuk ds ckjs esa crk;kA bl izdkj ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ds }kjk cuk;s x;s rhuksa xokgksa dk c;ku Hkh izekf.kd ugha ekuk tk;sxk D;ksafd Lo;a muds dFkukuqlkj mUgksaus ¼ifjoknh ½ gh lh0vks0 vkokl ls ckgj fudydj ?kVuk gksus laca/kh ckr crk;hA 5& ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ,oa muds }kjk cuk;s x;s rhuksa xokgksa ds c;ku esa dkQh fojks/kkHkkl gSA tgkW ifjoknh }kjk ;g c;ku fn;k x;k gS fd os vius lkFk vk;s rhuksa O;fDr;ksa dks eq[; }kj ls ckgj lM+d ij NksM+dj vdsys vapykf/kdkjh ls feyus x;s ogha muds cuk;s vU; xokgksa esa ls jkevorkj flag ;kno us dgk fd ;s pkjksa ,d lkFk vapykf/kdkjh ls feyus igqWps FksA bruk gh ugha vapykf/kdkjh ds vkokl ls ykSVus ds ckjs esa Hkh vyx & vyx xokgksa dk c;ku vyx&vyx gSA ykyth flag ds vuqlkj rhuksa cl ls okil ?kj ykSV x;s vkSj d`ikukjk;.k Fkkus pys x;s , tcfd jkevorkj flag ;kno ds vuqlkj os vius lkbZfdy ls ?kj okil py fn;s , d`ikukjk;.k Fkkus pys x;s ,oa vU; nks cl ls ykSV x;sA bl ifjisz{; esa ;g rF; vk'p;Ztud rFkk vfo'oluh; izrhr gksrk gS fd pkjksa O;fDr vapykf/kdkjh ls feyus vk;s Fks vkSj tc vapykf/kdkjh vkSj ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag ds chp ekjihV dh ?kVuk ?kV x;h rks ifjoknh Jh d`ikukjk;.k flag dks NksM+dj ckdh rhuksa ?kj pys x;s vkSj ifjoknh vdsys Fkkus ij x;sA tcfd lkekU; ifjfLFkfr esa ,slk gksrk gS fd lHkh yksx Fkkus ij tkrs gSA 6 & ifjoknh }kjk yxk;s x;s vkjksi ds i{k esa dsoy ifjoknh }kjk gh izR;{kn'khZ ds :i esa c;ku fn;k x;kA ;gkW rd dh ifjoknh }kjk cuk;s x;s xokgksa us crk;k fd vapykf/kdkjh ds lkFk ekjihV dh ?kVuk bUgsa ifjoknh ds }kjk gh crk;k x;k gSA xokgksa us dsoy bruk dgk fd vapykf/kdkjh cjkens rd vk;s vkSj dgk fd ;gkW ls tkvks ugh arks iqfyl dks vkjksi ds i{k esa dsoy ifjoknh }kjk gh izR;{kn'khZ ds :i esa c;ku fn;k x;kA ;gkW rd dh ifjoknh }kjk cuk;s x;s xokgksa us crk;k fd vapykf/kdkjh ds lkFk ekjihV dh ?kVuk bUgsa ifjoknh ds }kjk gh crk;k x;k gSA xokgksa us dsoy bruk dgk fd vapykf/kdkjh cjkens rd vk;s vkSj dgk fd ;gkW ls tkvks ugh arks iqfyl dks cqyk ysaxsA 7 &vU Lora= xokgksa ds }kjk Hkh vapykf/kdkjh ds vkokl ij fdlh izdkj dh gqbZ ?kVuk ds laca/k esa fdlh izdkj dh tkudkjh gksus ls budkj fd;k x;kA muyksaxksa us dsoy bruk crk;k fd uanuk eB dh tehu dks ysdj eB ds egkRekvksa ,oa ifjoknh ds chp dkQh iwoZ ls fookn pyk vk jgk gSA 8& ifjoknh ds yxk;s vkjksi ds vuqlkj ifjoknh ds lkFk vapykf/kdkjh ds ljdkjh vkokl ij vapykf/kdkjh ,oa vU; ds }kjk ekjihV dh ?kVuk dh x;h ijarq blls lacaf/kr fdlh izdkj dh lwpuk LFkuh; Fkkus dks ugha Fkh vkSj u gh vklikl ds yksxksa dks bl izdkj dh fdlh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa dksbZ tkudkjh FkhA 9&ifjoknh ds }kjk ?kVuk ds ckn Fkkus dks lwpuk ugha nh x;h ,oa ,d i[kokM+s ds ckn ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa ifjokn nk;j fd;k x;kA 10 & complaint case ua0 & 1298 @ 2008 ds ifjoknh ,oa cuk;s x;s vfHk;qDrksa ds chp uanuk eB dh tehu dks ysdj fookn gSA 11 & Fkkus }kjk dkjZokbZ ugha fd;s tkus ds ckn ifjoknh }kjk fdlh Hkh ojh; iqfyl inkf/kdkjh dks fdlh izdkj dh lwpuk ugha gh x;hA 12 & iwoZ esa Hkh ¼1997 & 98½ tc eB dh mDr tehu dh tekcanh eB ds uke dh x;h Fkh , ml le; Hkh ifjoknh d`ik ukjk;.k flag ds }kjk gh ,d ifjokn i= la0 & 581 @ 1997 & 98 eq[; U;kf;d n.Mkf/kdkjh , dSewj esa nk;j fd;k x;k FkkA vr% fu"d"kZr% bl ekeys esa nksuksa i{kksa ds eB dh Hkwfe laca/kh fookn rFkk ifjokn i=ksa dh i`"BHkwfe rFkk Hkwfe ds nkf[ky [kkfjt rFkk tekcanh laca/kh fookn vkfn rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd nksuksa i{kksa ds chp ekeyk o"kZ 1997 & 98 ls nhokuh izd`fr dk jgk Fkk , ftlesa le; rFkk lqfo/kkuqlkj ,d i{k }kjk vius i{k esa nhokuh ekeys dks curk ugha ns[k bls QkStnkjh izd`fr dk rFkk xaHkhj cukus dk gjlaHko iz;kl fd;k x;k vkSj blh Øe esa ifjoknh ds dFkukuqlkj mUgksaus bl ?kVuk ds laca/k esa ?kVuk ds fnu gh LFkkuh; Fkkuk dks fyf[kr o"kZ 1997 & 98 ls nhokuh izd`fr dk jgk Fkk , ftlesa le; rFkk lqfo/kkuqlkj ,d i{k }kjk vius i{k esa nhokuh ekeys dks curk ugha ns[k bls QkStnkjh izd`fr dk rFkk xaHkhj cukus dk gjlaHko iz;kl fd;k x;k vkSj blh Øe esa ifjoknh ds dFkukuqlkj mUgksaus bl ?kVuk ds laca/k esa ?kVuk ds fnu gh LFkkuh; Fkkuk dks fyf[kr :i ls lwfpr fd;k Fkk vkSj Fkkus esa muds vuqlkj dksbZ dkjZokbZ ugha gksus ds dkj.k ?kVuk ds 17 fnuksa ckn U;k;ky; esa ifjokn la0 & 1298 @ 08 ntZ djok;kA mYys[kuh; gS fd tgkW ,d vksj ?kVukLFky ds vklikl ds lHkh lacaf/kr O;fDr;ksa bR;kfn }kjk bl rjg dh ?kVuk gksus ls vfufHkKrk tkfgj dh x;h ogha nwljh vksj u rks LFkkuh; Fkkuk esa ?kVuk ls lacaf/kr fdlh izdkj dh lwpuk gksus dk dkbZ izek.k gS vkSj u gh ifjoknh ,oa muds lkFk esa jgs rhuksa O;fDr;ksa ds ?kVuk laca/kh c;ku rFkk fooj.k esa dksbZ rkjrE;rk gS rFkk ijLij fojks/kkHkklh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n'kkZrk gqvk izrhr gksrk gSA fo'ks”k mYys[kuh; gS fd ifjoknh }kjk vius fyf[kr c;ku esa iwoZ fu/kkZfjr fj'or dk ,d yk[k :i;k ysdj vkus rFkk blh Øe esa foi{kh ds lkFk feydj ekjihV dh ?kVuk djus dk vkjksi vapykf/kdkjh pSuiqj ij yxk;k x;k gSA ;g ckr lgt fo'oluh; izrhr ugha gksrk gS D;ksafd vxj vapykf/kdkjh fj'or ysdj ifjoknh ds i{k esa dke djus okys Fks , rks ifjoknh ds foi{k;ksa dks mlh le; cqykus dk dksbZ dkj.k le> esa ugha vkrkA blds vykok ;g lk/kkj.k ckr gS fd ;fn lh0vks0 ifjoknh ds i{k esa dke djus ds fy, fj'or ysaxs rks foi{kh dks bl ckr dk irk pyus nsus dk dksbZ eryc gh ugha gSA iwoZ ds fookn dh i`"BHkwfe esa ;fn iz[kaM ifjlj esa okLRo esa ifjoknh }kjk crk;h x;h ?kVuk gqbZ gksrh rks dksbZ dkj.k ugha gS fd Fkkuk }kjk dkjZokbZ ugha fd;s tkus dh fLFkfr esa ifjoknh lacaf/kr ojh; iqfyl inkf/kdkfj;ksa ds ;gkW rRdky ?kVuk ds laca/k esa lwfpr djrs vFkok LFkkuh; vLirky bR;kfn esa tkrs vkSj bZykt djokrsA ifjoknh ds }kjk ,slk dqN ugha fd;k x;k vkSj ckn esa lksp le>dj vius iwoZ ds nhokuh fookn dks xaHkhj rFkk QkStnkjh izd`fr ds cukus dk gjlaHko iz;kl fd;k x;k tcfd oLrqr% ifjoknh }kjk crk;h x;h ?kVuk ?kfVr gksus dk dksbZ Li"V vfHkys[kh;@ekSf[kd izek.k tkap ds Øe esa ugha ik;k x;k gSA** 5. Subsequently on 18.12.2013 an order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8834 of 2012, was placed for its (Courts) perusal and same was perused and direction was issued to list the case under appropriate heading forthwith. 6. On perusal of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court it transpired that against the order dated 7.8.2012, whereby, the Vigilance Investigation Bureau, was directed to conduct enquiry the complainant/opposite party no. 2 had preferred an appeal vide Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8834 of 2012, which was disposed of on 9.9.2013. The order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is as follows:- “Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel in support of this petition and Mr. Nagendra Rai, learned senior counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court directing a vigilance inquiry in the Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed by the respondents. That petition had been filed to quash the order dated 18.1.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in Complaint No. 1298 /2008. Though we have not impressed by the procedure adopted by the High Court, Mr. Rai, informs that the report as sought has already been placed before the High Court. If that is so, we leave it to the discretion to the High Court to take an appropriate decision on the report. It will be open to the petitioners to point out that such a report should not be looked into. The High Court will dispose of the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition at the earliest. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.” 7. In view of the order of the Apex Court the matter was placed for hearing under the heading “For Admission” and it was heard on number of dates and finally on 24.3.2014 after hearing the parties order was reserved. 8. At the time of hearing Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel who was assisted by Sri Tribhuwan Narayan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 at the very outset has pointed out that this court may not look into the report of the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. 8. At the time of hearing Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel who was assisted by Sri Tribhuwan Narayan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 at the very outset has pointed out that this court may not look into the report of the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. He submits that at the time of hearing of a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against an order of cognizance, this court is required to confine only to the materials which were available during the enquiry before the learned Magistrate and no other materials may be looked into. To corroborate his argument, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, has relied on State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & other, 2012 (1) PLJR SC 196. He has specifically referred to paragraph no. 31 to 33, 35 and 40 of the said judgment. He has also relied on Bibi Gulshan vs. State of Bihar & other, 2007 (1) PLJR 701 . In this case he has relied on paragraph no. 3 of the judgment. He has also relied on Ajay Kumar Das vs. State of Jharkhand & another, 2011 (4) PLJR SC 216. He has emphasized that this court may not go beyond the records, which were available before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at the time of passing of order of cognizance. In sum and substance he submits that report of the Vigilance Investigation Bureau, cannot be looked into, examined or relied upon while deciding the present case. On this very issue Sri Jitendra Singh, learned senior counsel, who was assisted by Sri Kamal Kishore Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, has argued that once in the present proceeding this court after hearing both the parties by its order dated 7.8.2012 had directed the Vigilance Investigation Bureau to conduct preliminary enquiry and thereafter report has been brought on record, this court may not ignore the report of the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. He submits that ignoring or overlooking the report may amount to reviewing of the order dated 7.8.2012, which may not be done in view of bar imposed under Section 362 of the Cr. P.C. He further submits that the order dated 7.8.2012 passed by this court, whereby, vigilance enquiry was directed was already assailed by the complainant /opposite party no. He submits that ignoring or overlooking the report may amount to reviewing of the order dated 7.8.2012, which may not be done in view of bar imposed under Section 362 of the Cr. P.C. He further submits that the order dated 7.8.2012 passed by this court, whereby, vigilance enquiry was directed was already assailed by the complainant /opposite party no. 2 before the Apex Court and since the Apex Court has not interfered with the order dated 7.8.2012, this order has already attained its finality, rather this order has merged with the order of the Apex Court and as such order dated 7.8.2012 may not be ignored. In the light of order dated 7.8.2012 this court may examine the report submitted by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. This court is of the opinion that once direction was issued by this court to Vigilance Investigation Bureau to conduct enquiry/investigation particularly in view of allegation made by the complainant in the complaint petition regarding demand of illegal gratification by one of the accused, who was public servant and thereafter once report has been submitted by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau, in normal course report of the Vigilance Investigation Bureau may not be ignored and it has to be looked into while deciding the present case. 9. Sri Jitendra Singh, learned senior counsel assailing the order impugned has emphatically argued that the complainant after losing his claim before the court of competent jurisdiction in the civil side has tried to give a colour of criminal case by filing the present complaint petition. He highlights that nucleus of the entire allegation in the complaint petition is the land pertaining to plot no. 302 and 303, which the complainant claims to be his ancestral property. Whereas, property in dispute is the property of Ashram, which was gifted by the father of the complainant long back. Sri Jitendra Singh, learned senior counsel referring to Annexure – 3 to the present petition submits that in the year 1988 itself the complainant had filed a title suit vide Title Suit No. 23 of 1988 for dispossessing one Shivdharmanand and others, who were associated with the Ashram from the property in dispute and for giving delivery of possession to the complainant. The said suit was dismissed. The said suit was dismissed. Thereafter the complainant filed a Title Appeal vide Title Appeal No. 45 /59 of 1992/93 and after rejection of the Title Appeal he preferred Second Appeal No. 454 of 1993, which was also dismissed on 9.1.1996. He submits that the complainant in a civil dispute, though he lost every where, has maliciously filed the present complaint case giving the colour of criminal offence. He highlights that on the basis of averments made in the complaint petition itself the order of cognizance is liable to be set aside as the prosecution is malicious and mala fide. Sri Singh has heavily relied on State of Haryana and others vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others, AIR 1992 SC 604 . He also submits that allegation in the complaint petition is apparently absurd and inherently improbable. He submits that in the complaint petition once complainant had alleged that the accused no. 3, the then Circle Officer, Chainpur, district - Kaimur had demanded Rs. 1,00000/- for mutating the disputed land in his favour, there was no occasion for the Circle Officer to call the petitioners at the time of discussion regarding illegal gratification. In normal course it is not possible that while demanding illegal gratification a public servant will call others to remain present at that very time. He has specifically referred to illustration no. 5 of paragraph no. 108 of the judgment of Bhajan Lal Case (Supra). Sri Jitendra Singh corroborating his submission that this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is competent to quash the order of cognizance or even entire proceeding on the ground of malicious prosecution or on the ground that the allegation is improbable has relied on State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi, (2005) 1 SCC 568 and All Cargo Movers (I) Pvt. Ltd. & other vs. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain & another, 2008 (1) PLJR SC 51. He further submits that improbability of the offence and mala fide on the part of complainant has been substantiated during enquiry by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. Accordingly he submits that order of cognizance is liable to be set aside. In the present case petitioners have filed supplementary affidavit enclosing therewith the chart of cases. He further submits that improbability of the offence and mala fide on the part of complainant has been substantiated during enquiry by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. Accordingly he submits that order of cognizance is liable to be set aside. In the present case petitioners have filed supplementary affidavit enclosing therewith the chart of cases. Sri Jitendra Singh, learned senior counsel referring to chart of supplementary affidavit submits that number of cases were filed either by the complainant or as per his instance against the petitioners. However, this submission was refuted by the complainant and complainant has also filed reply to the supplementary affidavit and has tried to justify that the allegation of the petitioners regarding filing of number of cases is not correct. 10. Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for complainant/opposite party no. 2 has vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioners. He submits that regarding offences under Sections 323, 504/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, there is specific accusation in the complaint petition itself, which was corroborated in the statement of complainant on solemn affirmation as well as witnesses who were examined during the enquiry and as such, the learned Magistrate has rightly passed the order of cognizance. Controverting the submission of learned senior counsel for the petitioners that in respect of same property the complainant had filed Title Suit, he submits that Title Suit which has been referred by the petitioners in Annexure-3 to the petition was not pertaining to the land in dispute. In the complaint case, he emphasized that the land mentioned in the present complaint petition is entirely different from the land mentioned in the Annexure-3 to the petition. He has emphasized that on the basis of materials which were available before the learned Magistrate, the learned Magistrate has passed right and correct order of cognizance, which is not required to be interfered with and the petition is fit to be rejected. 11. Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the complaint petition itself the court is of the opinion that in a civil dispute colour of criminal offence has been given by the complainant. Moreover, this fact has been noticed by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau in its report which has been quoted above. The allegation made in the complaint petition also appears to be not probable. On perusal of the complaint petition itself the court is of the opinion that in a civil dispute colour of criminal offence has been given by the complainant. Moreover, this fact has been noticed by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau in its report which has been quoted above. The allegation made in the complaint petition also appears to be not probable. Once the complainant has alleged that he had gone to the official residence of Accused No. 3 / Circle Officer in relation to demand of illegal gratification, in normal course, one can not perceive that a public servant at the same time can entertain a person, who is having strained relation with the person from whom demand was made. All the facts have been noticed in the enquiry which was conducted deeply by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances, this court is of the opinion that the order of cognizance as well as entire proceeding in Complaint Case No. 1298 of 2008 is liable to be set aside on the ground of improbability. Allowing such proceeding may amount to allowing abuse of the process of the Court. Moreover, the contents of the complaint petition reflects nature of civil dispute. Accordingly the order dated 18.1.2010 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Complaint Case No. 1298 of 2008 in respect of petitioners is hereby set aside and the petition stands allowed.