JUDGMENT Manoj Misra,J.: - Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By the present application, the applicants have sought for quashing of the proceedings of complaint case no.814 of 2013, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 498-A IPC and Section 3 /4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to police station Narkhi, district Firozabad. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that the complaint has been lodged with false and malicious allegations. 4. Be that as it may, the complaint and the statement of the complainant as well as of the witnesses recorded in support thereof do, prima facie, make out a case for drawing proceeding against the applicants, therefore, the proceedings cannot be quashed at the threshold. The prayer of the applicants for quashing of the proceeding is therefore rejected. 5. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this application is disposed of with a direction that in case the applicants appear before the Court concerned and apply for bail within 30 days from today, their bail applications shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with the law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. : 2004 (57) ALR 290 as affirmed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P: [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)]. 6. It is made clear that coercive processes, if any, issued against the applicants have not been stayed.