JUDGMENT 1. - The petitioner/s filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. An award was passed in favour of the petitioner/s. When execution of award was sought, a condition was imposed for solvent surety of the owner so that while payment is made by the insurance company, recovery thereof can be sought by the insurance company from the solvent surety. The issue aforesaid has already been decided by this Court in several cases. In the case of Kumari Nargis & Ors. v. Karan Singh & Ors., reported in 2007 RAR (Raj.) 332 , it was held that condition incorporated by the MACT for release of amount of compensation is not legal, accordingly order to that extent was set aside. The judgment aforesaid was given after referring the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Nanjappan reported in 2004 ACJ 721 and Pramod Kumar v. Mushtari Begum, reported in 2004 ACJ 1903 . 2. In the cases of Dheeraj Lal (Shree) v. The new India Assurance Company & Ors., reported in MACD 2008 (1) (Raj.) 50, Gaura Devi (Smt.) & Ors. v. Mr. Kishan Lal & Anr., reported in MACD 2008 (1) (Raj.) 122 & in the case of Banwari Lal v. Gopi Ram & Anr. reported in 2005 RAR 529 (Raj.) same view has been taken. 3. In the background aforesaid, the impugned order cannot be allowed to sustained putting condition in regard to release of payment on furnishing solvent surety. The impugned order is thus set aside. The MACT is directed to get execution of the order without aforesaid condition. 4. The writ petition is disposes of with the aforesaid and if the amount has been deposited by the insurance company, it may be released.Writ Petition dismissed. *******