Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 637 (GAU)

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD v. STATE OF ASSAM

2014-06-18

A.M.SAPRE, UJJAL BHUYAN

body2014
JUDGMENT (Sapre, CJ) Heard Mr RK Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr DC Chakraborty and Mr R Dubey, learned counsel for the respondents. The decision rendered in this petition shall also govern disposal of WP(C) 4819/2006 and WP(C) 5087/2006 because in all these petitions a common question of law is involved. By filing this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Assam General Sales Tax Act, 2001. It is brought to our notice that this Act was declared ultra vires by this Court in a case reported in 2008 (15) VST Page 70 (State of Assam & Ors. –vs- Chota Bhai Jetha Bhai Patel Tobacco Products Company Ltd. ) decided on 30.8.2007. It is also brought to our notice that against the said decision, the State has gone to Supreme Court in SLP being SLP Nos. 24934-25066 of 2007 which are pending for final disposal in Supreme Court. It may also be pertinent to mention that subsequent to the decision rendered by this Court in Chota Bhai Jetha Bhai Patel Tobacco Products Company Ltd. (supra), the State came out with another legislation on the same subject by removing the defects on which the Assam General Sales Tax Act was declared unconstitutional by another name called - Assam Entry Tax Act, 2008 and made this Act retrospectively applicable with effect from 1.10.2001. The assessees again challenged the constitutional validity of this Act but this time unsuccessfully before this Court in a decision reported in 2009 (1) GLT 427 (Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. –vs- State of Assam & Ors.) decided on 9.1.2009. By this decision, this time High Court upheld the Act and held it as constitutionally valid. This matter was carried to the Supreme Court at the instance of unsuccessful assesses in SLP against this decision. Both the SLPs i.e. the one arising out of the decision rendered in Chota Bhai Jetha Bhai Patel’s case (supra) and other arising out of Indian Oil Corporation’s case (supra) are now pending in the Supreme Court and are being heard together by the Supreme Court. Both the SLPs i.e. the one arising out of the decision rendered in Chota Bhai Jetha Bhai Patel’s case (supra) and other arising out of Indian Oil Corporation’s case (supra) are now pending in the Supreme Court and are being heard together by the Supreme Court. It is with this background, we are of the considered view that these petitions can be disposed of with the observation that any decision that will be rendered by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid 2 SLPs arising out of two decisions referred above would also govern the rights of the petitioners so far as these petitions are concerned in relation to subject matter of these writ petitions. Indeed, by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution of India, the law laid down by the Supreme Court is binding on every assessee/State. It is with these observations, the writ petitions stand accordingly disposed of. No cost.