Judgment : 1. Petitioners have assailed notices at Annexures A to A6, issued by the Tahsildar, Bangalore North (Addi.) Taluk, Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore. Those notices are issued under sub-section (3) of Section 94 of the Karnataka land Revenue Act, 1964. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners state that pursuant to those notices, the petitioners have appeared before the respondent-authorities and proceedings are pending. However, the apprehension of the petitioners is that even before conclusion of the proceedings initiated through the impugned notices, there would be adverse action taken against the petitioners, which may be even demolition of petitioners' premises. It is on that apprehension, these writ petitions have been filed. 3. Learned AGA appearing for the respondents submits that till the conclusion of the proceedings pursuant to the impugned notices, no adverse action would be initiated against the petitioners herein. Submission of the learned Counsel for the respondents- authorities is placed on record. 4. In that view of the matter, no further orders are called for in these writ petitions except observing that till the conclusion of the proceedings initiated pursuant to the impugned notices resulting in a speaking order, the respondent-authorities shall not take any precipitative action against the petitioners herein. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand disposed.