JUDGMENT Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral):- Petitioner-Tej Pal son of Shiv Lal, has directed the instant petition for the grant of concession of regular bail, invoking the provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C., in a case registered against him along with his other co-accused, vide FIR No.104 dated 26.09.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 420, 471 and 120-B IPC, by the police of Police Station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable assistance and after deep consideration over the entire matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition for regular bail deserves to be accepted in this context. 4. Concisely, the prosecution claimed that petitioner and his other co-accused prepared a false power of attorney and sold the land of Balveer Singh and Jaswant Singh, situated in District Meerut (U.P.) to Ikhlakh Khan and Barajpal, by virtue of registered sale deed executed at Meerut. Neither the vendor (owner) nor the vendee lodged any case against the petitioner pertaining to the indicated transaction. It was Harinder Singh Dhillon, who lodged the FIR against the petitioner in police station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga. In that eventuality, as to whether the complainant can be stated to be an aggrieved person or not, would be a moot point to be decided during the course of trial by the trial Court. 5. Be that as it may, petitioner was arrested on 11.02.2014. Since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. All the offences alleged against the accused are triable by the Court of Magistrate. Even since the charges have not yet been framed against the accused, so, conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time. 6. In the light of aforesaid reasons, taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side, during the course of trial of main case, the instant petition for regular bail is accepted. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 7. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 7. Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect on the merits of the main case, in any manner, during the course of trial, as the same has been so recorded for a limited purpose of deciding the present petition for regular bail. ---------0.B.S.0------------