Order I.A. No. 5355 of 2013 Delay of eleven days occurred in preferring the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. 2. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. LPA No. 923 of 2013 3. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 2nd April 2013 made by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No.3475 of 2010, the writ petitioners have preferred this Appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent. 4. In 2005, the appellants were appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra under the Gram Panchyat Raj Sapdahar, Block Bounsi, District Banka. While serving as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, on and with effect from 1st July 2006, they were absorbed as Panchayat Teachers by operation of rule 20(iii) of the Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Employment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006. While the appellants were serving as Panchayat Teachers, in view of the judgment of this Court in the matter of Kishori Prasad vs. State of Bihar [2008 (2) PLJR 458] and consequent Government resolution dated 4th July 2008, the respondent nos. 8 to 11 earlier appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra but not continued as such after 2005 were appointed as Panchayat Teacher. In the process, the appellants were displaced. The challenge before the learned Single Judge has failed. Therefore, this Appeal. 5. The matter at issue has been finally decided by a Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Kalpana Rani vs State of Bihar [ 2014(2) PLJR 665 ]. The above referred judgment in the matter of Kishori Prasad vs. State of Bihar has been held to be per incurium and is expressly overruled. The above referred resolution dated 4th July 2008 has also been held to be ultra vires Rule 20 of the aforesaid Rules of 2006 in the matter of Renu Kumari Pandey vs. State of Bihar [2011 (3) PLJR 497]. 6. In view of the aforesaid binding judgments, this Appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 2nd April 2013 made by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No.3475 of 2010 is set aside. CWJC No.3475 of 2010 is allowed. 7. The respondent nos. 3, 6 and 7 are directed to reinstate the appellants as Panchayat Teachers as early as possible but not later then 31st July 2014. In the event the respondents fail to reinstate the appellants as Panchayat Teachers by 31st July 2014, the appellants will be entitled to recover salary/wages as Panchayat Teacher commencing from 1st August 2014. The respondent nos. 3, 6 and 7 are directed to reinstate the appellants as Panchayat Teachers as early as possible but not later then 31st July 2014. In the event the respondents fail to reinstate the appellants as Panchayat Teachers by 31st July 2014, the appellants will be entitled to recover salary/wages as Panchayat Teacher commencing from 1st August 2014. The period from 7th July 2009 the appellants were discharged from service till the date they are reinstated in service as Panchayat Teachers will be treated as period on duty for the purpose of continuity in service. The appellants will however not be entitled to the actual salary for the said period. 8. In view of the above referred binding judgments, we hold that the action of the respondents in appointing the respondent nos. 8 to 11 as Panchayat Teachers is bad and illegal and is contrary to aforesaid Rules of 2006. The said respondents neither have a right to appointment; nor do they have a right to continue as Panchayat Teachers. 9. Interlocutory Applications stand disposed of. 10. Registry will serve copy of this order to the respondent nos. 3, 6 and 7 forthwith.