Judgment A.M. SAPRE, J. Heard Mr. D.C.K. Hazarika, learned counsel for the applicants-review petitioners and Mr. D. Saikia, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Health Department, appearing for the respondents. This is an application made by the applicants/ review petitioners for condonation of delay in filing the review petition u/s. 5 of the Limitation Act. According to the applicants/ review petitioners, the delay is of 584 days. We have gone through the cause stated in the application duly supported by an affidavit. In our opinion, it constitutes a bonafide and sufficient cause for the purpose of condoning the delay within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The condonation of delay advances cause of justice whereas converse defeats the cause of doing substantial justice. There is no deliberate delay on the part of the review petitioners in filing the review petition and, therefore, the delay in filing the review petition deservers to be condoned on the grounds stated in the application. Accordingly and in view of the aforesaid discussion, Misc. Case No. 2135 of 2014 is allowed. The delay in filing the review petition is hereby condoned. Misc. case stands, accordingly, disposed of.