Judgment A.M. SAPRE, J. Heard Dr. Ashok Saraf, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant-revision petitioner and Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Taxes, appearing for the respondents. This is an application made by the applicant-revision petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the revision petition u/s. 5 of the Limitation Act. According to the applicant-revision petitioner, the delay is of 111 days. We have gone through the cause stated in the application duly supported by an affidavit. In our opinion, it constitutes a bonafide and sufficient cause for the purpose of condoning the delay within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The condonation of delay advances cause of justice whereas converse defeats the cause of doing substantial justice. There is no deliberate delay on the part of the applicant-revision petitioner in filing the revision petition and, therefore, the delay in filing the revision petition deservers to be condoned on the grounds stated in the application. Accordingly and in view of the aforesaid discussion, Misc. Case No. 3789 of 2013 is allowed. The delay in filing the revision petition is hereby condoned. Misc. case stands, accordingly, disposed of. List the revision petition for hearing on the question of admission in the week commencing from 11th of August, 2014.