Order Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. A case was filed for grant of succession certificate in favour of the applicant, being second wife of the deceased-Luxman Oraon. After the parties adduced their evidences the case was fixed for argument. At the stage of argument, an application was filed for taking, written statement filed in connection with other case and also affidavit sworn by Rama Oraon, in evidence. Subsequently on 14.3.2014, one more application was filed for taking the voter list in evidence. Thereafter, written statement and also the affidavit sworn by Rama Oraon as well as the voter list were taken in evidence vide order dated 31.3.2014 which order is under challenge. 3. Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has committed illegality in taking the written statement and affidavit in evidence without getting those documents proved in accordance with law. Further, it was submitted that the court should not have allowed to take the voter list in evidence at the fag end of the trial and, therefore, impugned order is fit to be set aside. 4. As against, Mr. Atanu Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in view of the pleadings of the parties, those documents have been taken in evidence and that the voter list a public document it has been taken in evidence nothing wrong has been done and, thereby, the court has not committed any illegality particularly when the written statement and affidavit were on record from before. 5. Admittedly, written statement and the affidavit of Rama Oraon have been taken in evidence without proving those documents in accordance with law. Thus, the court has committed illegality in taking those documents in evidence and, thereby, the order passed by the court in this respect is set aside. So far matter relates to taking the voter list in evidence is concerned, I do not find any illegality with the order impugned, accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. This order will not come in the way of the petitioner in pursuing the matter in accordance with law.