Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 849 (MP)

Urmila Agrawal v. State of M. P.

2014-07-18

ALOK VERMA, RAJENDRA MENON

body2014
JUDGMENT 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is seen that this petition has been filed against an interlocutory order passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Cooperative Tribunal on 17th May, 2013 in the matter of refusing certain interim relief to the petitioner. 2. The Tribunal has refused interim relief but at the same time has directed the election tribunal headed by the Joint Registrar to decide the dispute within a reasonable time. 3. It is further stated that within that time the Joint Registrar has still not decided the matter. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to interfere into the interlocutory question of granting interim relief at this stage. 4. However, the Joint Registrar before whom the election dispute is pending i.e. respondent No. 2 is directed to take steps for concluding hearing of the petition and decide it in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.