JUDGMENT Heard on admission. 1. Admit. 2. Case diary is not available, however there is sufficient documents on record for consideration of the application. With the consent of the parties the case is heard finally. 3. The applicant has an apprehension of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 370 of 2014, registered at Police Station Maihar, District Satna, for the offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that if he is arrested in this false case, the same will affect to the applicant and cause irreparable loss to the applicant. The applicant is ready to cooperate in the investigation and trial. He also belongs to a reputed family, having no past criminal antecedents, in the event of arrest, his reputation will be tarnished, therefore, he be released on anticipatory bail. 5. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for the State opposes the application. 6. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I am of the view that this is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Consequently, his application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. 7. It is directed that in the event of arrest, present applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Police Officer. 8. The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. He shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub- Section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. Certified copy as per rules.