JUDGMENT 1. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 19.6.2014 passed in Hindu Marriage Act Case No. 4 A/2014; whereby, on an application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, the Trial Court has granted Rs. 2500/­ per month as maintenance pendetelite. 2. Suit at the instance of applicant/plaintiff is under Section 9, Hindu Marriage Act. Respondent/applicant filed an application under Section 24, Hindu Marriage Act for grant of pendentelite maintenance Rs. 3000/­ per month on the ground that besides maintaining herself she has to maintain a child borne out of the wedlock and is living with her parents. It was further contended that the applicant/plaintiff owes five acre land and from other work he earns Rs. 10000/­ per month. The application was opposed at by the applicant/plaintiff on the ground that the respondent is employed in government school as Teacher. However, no material has been brought on record to establish the fact that the respondent is employed as a government teacher nor it is established that the same was brought before the Trial Court. 3. The Trial Court after due consideration held the respondent/defendant entitled for Rs. 2500/­ per month as maintenance pendentelite and Rs. 1500/­ with cost of litigation. Though it is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the Trial Court grossly erred in misconstruing the fact; however, taking into consideration the facts on record and in absence of any cogent material to establish that respondent/defendant is employed as a government teacher, the impugned order does not warrant interference. Consequently, the revision fails and is dismissed.