JUDGMENT 1.Heard. This is second bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The first bail application has been dismissed vide order dated 20.8.2013 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 5196 of 2013. The applicant has been arrested in Crime No. 70 of 2013 registered at Police Station, Tyonda, District Vidisha, under Sections 456, 307, 323, 294, 34, 450, 302 of IPC and under Section 25/27 of Arms Act. 2. As per the prosecution case, marriage of the sister of complainant was solemnized with Sanju. Sanju used to beat Leela. Father of Leela brought Leela to his house and Leela was residing with parents. On 1.4.2013 Sanju, Pradeep and Phool Singh came on motor cycle and dragged the father of the complainant, who was sleeping in the house gave beating by means of Katar and Sword as a result of which Gopal died. 3. Learned counsel submits that the applicant is under custody since 1.4.2013 and trial has not concluded so far, hence prayed for bail on the ground of delay in trial. 4. The prayer is opposed by learned Panel Lawyer. It is true that the applicant is under custody since 1.4.2013, but no order sheet has been placed on record to demonstrate that for the delay in trial the prosecution agency is responsible. Under such circumstances and looking to the fact that the applicant is named in the promptly lodged FIR, the applicant is not entitled for bail. Consequently, the bail application stands dismissed.