JUDGMENT 1.Heard. 2. Since the main impugned order is passed by an authority situated within the jurisdiction of the High Court of Chhattisgarh i.e. Deputy Labour Commissioner, Raipur (CG), originally this Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the claim against the said order. However, it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that part of cause of action has accrued within the jurisdiction of this Court as the head office of the petitioner is situated at Bhopal, all orders were issued from that head office against the respondent No. 1, therefore, still the writ petition is maintainable before this Court. 3. It is not conceivable that an order passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Raipur (CG) will not come in the way of the petitioner if the orders passed by the petitioner against the respondent No. 1 at Bhopal are looked into. In fact, all those orders passed by the petitioner at Bhopal have been dealt with by the Deputy Labour Commissioner Raipur (CG). If that order remains intact, no relief whatsoever could be granted to the petitioner in respect of action initiated against it by and under the orders passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner Raipur (CG). That being so, prima facie this petition is not maintainable before this Court, which deserves to be and is hereby dismissed only on the ground of maintainability. The course open to the petitioner for redressal of grievance raised in the present petition would not be obstructed in case the same is agitated in appropriate manner before the appropriate Court. The writ petition stands dismissed.