ORDER : Jyoti Saran, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. Since in each of these cases the relief prayed by the petitioners is identical hence they have been taken up together for analogous hearing and disposal with the consent of the parties. 3. The petitioners in each of the writ petitions seek a direction to the Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas-Cum-Authorised Officer under the Forest Act, 1927, for provisional release of their respective vehicle pending adjudication of the confiscation proceedings. In each of these cases the vehicle of these petitioners stands seized on grounds of alleged violation of the provisions of the Forest Act and which has led to institution of the Forest Case which is now pending consideration in respective confiscation proceedings before the Authorised Officer who happens to be the Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas. 4. Although learned counsel for the petitioner have tried to support the load of chip stones on the respective vehicles and to submit that each of the load was supported with valid papers/challans but since the matter is pending before the Authorised Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas at Sasarm hence this Court would refrain to express any opinion on merits of the claim pending final adjudication. 5. The contention advanced by the learned counsel for the respective petitioners in support of their prayer for provisional release of the vehicles is that keeping the vehicles under the open sky to face the vagaries of the weather would serve no purpose and would only turn them obsolete rendering them useless for any future use and which would benefit none rather it would only result in loss. 6. Learned counsel for the respective petitioners have stated that the petitioners would not be creating any third party right nor they would alienate the vehicle pending disposal of the respective confiscation case and that they would produce the vehicle as and when required in the confiscation proceedings. It is also the contention of learned counsel that petitions have also been filed before the statutory authority but has remained pending in most of the cases and thus these writ petitions. The individual details of the petitioner in each of the writ petitions are given herein below. It is also the contention of learned counsel that petitions have also been filed before the statutory authority but has remained pending in most of the cases and thus these writ petitions. The individual details of the petitioner in each of the writ petitions are given herein below. (1) C.W.J.C. No. 12704 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. WB-23C/0681 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 32 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 42 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (2) C.W.J.C. No. 13078 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. JH-02K/3473 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 23 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 33 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (3) C.W.J.C. No. 13107 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-24G/1371 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 42 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 52 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (4) C.W.J.C. No. 13350 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-24G/1879 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 42 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 52 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (5) C.W.J.C. No. 13672 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. HR-38L/3239 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 42 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 52 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (6) C.W.J.C. No. 13798 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. CG-04G/4925 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 63 of 2013 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 112 of 2013 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (7) C.W.J.C. No. 14134 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. MP-19M/0221 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 42 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 52 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (8) C.W.J.C. No. 14141 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-26F/2488 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Dehri (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 229 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 50 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (9) C.W.J.C. No. 14263 of 2014 In this case the vehicle/tractor of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-24J/0428 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 31 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 41 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (10) C.W.J.C. No. 14362 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. CG-4HB/6381 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 23 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 33 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (11) C.W.J.C. No. 14672 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-44C/3307 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Forest Case No. 3 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 16 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (12) C.W.J.C. No. 14892 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-26/4915 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Nasrignaj P.S. Case No. 85 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 49 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. (13) C.W.J.C. No. 14893 of 2014 In this case the vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No. NL01G/8777 was seized on allegations of transporting forest produce without any supportive papers giving rise to Nasriganj No. 85 of 2014 which has led to registration of Confiscation Case No. 49 of 2014 pending adjudication before the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and I have perused the materials on record. 8. As I have taken note of herein above, the vehicles of these petitioners stand seized on allegation of being loaded with illegally mined stone chips. Though learned counsel for the respective petitioners have tried to defend the load carried on each of the vehicles but considering that the matter is pending adjudication before the statutory authority, this Court would express no opinion thereon. However taking note of the circumstances that these vehicles are lying unattended under the open sky to face the vagaries of weather, this Court is of the opinion that allowing these vehicles to turn obsolete would benefit none rather it would only lead to losses and thus this Court would deem fit and proper to order for the provisional release of the vehicles subject to furnishing of supporting papers of ownership and security as deem fit and proper by the authorised officer and which release obviously would be subject to final outcome of the confiscation proceedings. 9. In the circumstances discussed, this Court would direct the Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas Forest Division, Rohtas-cum-Authorised Officer under the Forest Act, 1927 in seisin of the respective confiscation cases which are subject matter of the present proceedings to release the respective vehicles in favour of the petitioners within four weeks of the receipt/production of a copy of the order subject to the fulfilment of the following conditions. (a) The petitioner shall produce all original papers supporting the ownership of the vehicle in question including the registration papers, the insurance paper, the tax token and the pollution certificate. (b) The petitioner shall file an undertaking in the form of an affidavit that he shall not alienate the vehicle or transfer the vehicle in favour of any third party during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and shall produce the vehicle as and when required in the confiscation proceedings. (c) The petitioner shall furnish such security as deem fit and proper by the Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorised Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram which shall neither be in the form of cash nor bank guarantee. (d) The release of the vehicle shall be governed by the final outcome of the confiscation proceedings. 10. With the observations and directions aforementioned, the writ petitions are disposed of.