JUDGMENT 1.Heard finally. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. Applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No. 757 of 2014 registered at Police Station Betul, District Betul for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. Applicant is mother-in-law of the complainant Rekha. It is alleged against the applicant that she subjected Rekha to cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is a matrimonial case where in the event of arrest, the possibility of the compromise will be diminished. She is a senior citizen of 65 and there is no possibility of her fleeing away from the justice, therefore, she prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State has objected the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Considering the contentions raised on behalf of the parties along with the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that present is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand only) with a surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer. The applicant shall abide by the conditions enumerated in sub-Section (2) of Section 438 Cr.P.C. She shall also make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. In view of the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, JT 2010 (13) SC 247, this order shall remain in force till the end of the trial. C.C. as per rules.