Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 984 (HP)

Ghallo Devi v. Baldev Singh

2014-07-25

P.S.RANA

body2014
JUDGMENT : - P.S. Rana, J. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted before the Court that compromise deed Ext.PA has been executed between the parties. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties submitted that RSA No.341 of 2010 be disposed of in terms of the compromise deed Ext.PA. Court has perused the compromise deed Ext.PA and placed on record. Court is satisfied that compromise deed Ext.PA has been executed inter se the parties. Hence decree is passed as per terms and conditions of compromise deed Ext.PA. Judgments and decrees of learned trial Court and first Appellate Court modified to this extent only. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Compromise deed Ext.PA placed on record will form part and parcel of the decree. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties submitted that consideration amount mentioned in para-3 of the compromise deed Ext.PA has already been received by the concerned party. Entitled party will be legally entitled to withdraw amount already deposited in the Treasury in accordance with law. RSA No.341 of 2010 is disposed of accordingly, so also pending application(s) if any.