JUDGMENT 1. - Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that the order dated 16th July, 2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate No.2, Distt. Jaipur whereby he partly accepted the compromise qua offence under Section 494 IPC and rejected the same qua offence under Section 498A IPC on the ground that the same is non-compoundable be set aside and the proceedings arising out of impugned FIR be set aside. 2. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was married with respondent No.2 Smt. Prem Devi. It is contended that since the matrimonial relations had turned sour, respondent No.2 had lodged the FIR for offences under Section 498A and 406 IPC. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings, a joint application was filed by the petitioner and the respondent No.2 wherein it was prayed that since compromise has been arrived between the parties and petitioner has handed over Rs. 3,50,000/- as final settlement of the matrimonial dispute to the respondent No.2, proceedings be dropped. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that vide order dated 16th July, 2013, compromise has been accepted qua offence under Section 494 IPC but the same has been rejected qua offence under Section 498A IPC. 3. Shri NS Dhakkar, learned Public Prosecutor has not denied that the compromise was affected between the parties and the same was presented before the trial court. 4. Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the judgment of BS Joshi & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr. reported in 2003 Vol. 4 SCC Page 675 to contend that where matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash the proceedings. Taking into account the order dated 16th July, 2013 whereby compromise was verified by the trial court, this Court is of the view that continuation of the proceedings in a matrimonial dispute is misuse and abuse of process of law. 5. Thus, in view of the ratio of law laid down in BS Joshi & Ors. (supra), present petition is accepted and the proceedings arising out of FIR No.228/2006 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura Distt. Jaipur along with all subsequent proceedings is quashed. 6. However, liberty is granted to the complainant to request for recalling of the order in case compromise between the parties is not prevailing.Petition Accepted with Liberty to Complaint. *******