Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 996 (MP)

R. K. Yadav v. State of M. P.

2014-08-11

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA

body2014
JUDGMENT 1.Heard on the question of admission. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the enquiry report as well as the order dated 26.7.2014, whereby after the departmental enquiry the petitioner has been imposed the punishment of dismissal in terms of Rule 10(9) of the M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966. 3. It is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is an appellable order and the appeal lies before the appellate authority under the provisions of the Rules against the impugned order. 4. In view of the fact that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy of appeal available against the impugned order, no good ground is made out to entertain the writ petition at this stage. The petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the appellate authority in terms of the Rules. If such an appeal is preferred by the petitioner, the same will be considered and decided by the appellate authority as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of its receipt. C.C. as per rules.