JUDGMENT : Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3, apart from perusing the record. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself. Briefly stated, the petitioner joined the Parassinikadavu Ayurveda Medical College on 04/12/2002 as Reader, and later became the Principal on 01/05/2011. Owing to what is said to be management dispute, one Sri. Pattyam Rajan, claiming to be the President of the 2nd respondent Society, filed a civil suit and obtained an ex parte injunction in OS No. 514/2014. The said Order eventually resulted in the suspension of the petitioner with effect from 20th May, 2014. 2. As could be seen from the records, later the Civil Court vacated the interim injunction through Ext. P4 dated 26th September, 2014. In that context, the 2nd respondent issued Ext. P2 proceedings to the 3rd respondent directing petitioner's reinstatement. When no consequent measures were taken pursuant to Ext. P2, the petitioner is said to have made Ext. P1 representation before the 1st respondent. Later, it was followed up with Ext. P5 reminder. Complaining of non-implementation of Ext. P2 order of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this Court, without adverting to the merits of the matter, disposes of the present writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Exts. P1 and P5 representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon, taking into account Ext. P2 direction of the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If required, the petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 3rd respondent.