JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. Subject matter of this appeal is the award, dated 21st June, 2008, made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solan, Camp at Nalagarh (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in MAC Petition No. 6 NL/2 of 2006, whereby compensation to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/- from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization, came to be awarded in favour of the claimants-respondents No. 1 & 2, herein and against the insurer-appellant, herein (for short, the “impugned award”), on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal. 2. The claimants have not questioned the impugned award, on any count. Thus, it has attained finality, so far as it relates to them. 3. Only, the insurer has questioned the impugned award. 4. The learned Counsel for the appellant-insurer argued that the Tribunal has fallen in an error in awarding compensation in favour of the claimants, who are legal representatives of the owner of the offending vehicle and risk of the owner was not covered in terms of the mandate of the Insurance Policy, Ext. RW-1/A. 5. The Tribunal has made discussion in para-11 of the impugned judgment. 6. I have gone through the said findings. The Tribunal has rightly recorded the findings and saddled the insurer with the liability, in view of the fact that the insurance policy, Ext. RW-1/A, is a package policy and risk is covered. Thus, it is held that the insurer has to satisfy the award. 7. Having said so, no interference is required. Accordingly, the impugned award is upheld and the appeal is dismissed. 8. The Registry is directed to release the awarded amount in favour of the claimants, strictly as per the terms and conditions contained in the impugned award. 9. Send down the records after placing a copy of the judgment on the Tribunal's file.