JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. registered as Case Crime No.134 of 2015, under Section 3/5 Ka of the Prevention of Cows Slaughter Act and under Section 11-Gha of the Animal Cruelty Act, Police Station Phaphund, District Auraiya. 3. The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2006 (56) ACC 433 reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2000 Cri. L.J. 569 after considering the various decisions of the Apex Court including State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal and others, AIR 1992 SC 604 that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operation on the power of the Police to investigate a case. 4. From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the FIR or staying the arrest of the petitioners. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is provided that if the petitioners appear before the court concerned within three weeks from today and apply for bail in the aforesaid case, their prayer for bail shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with the observations made by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290 and reiterated by the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (4) SCC 437 .