Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 1067 (HP)

Pinjar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2015-08-11

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN

body2015
JUDGMENT Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. 1. It appears that the writ petitioner was posted on secondment basis with respondent No. 3 vide office order, dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure P-2). Thereafter, vide office order, dated 18.12.2014 (Annexure P-3), the services of the writ petitioner stand repatriated to the parent department and he has been posted in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, on secondment basis, which is subject matter of this writ petition. 2. We have examined the pleadings and are of the considered view that the writ petitioner has no case. The writ petitioner is the employee of the State and the State has the discretion to send him on deputation or to repatriate his services. The writ petitioner has no right to question the same. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed alongwith all pending applications. Interim directions, if any, are vacated.