ORDER This application has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo No. 1010 (ii) dated 20.05.15 (Annexure-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder, he detained the petitioner in exercise of power conferred upon him under Section 12 (2) of the Jharkhand Crime Control Act 2002 (hereinafter referred as 'Act'). 2. It is submitted by Sri P.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid order of detention is bad, because it is violative of Section 17 (1) of the Act. It is submitted that as per Section 17 (1) of the Act, the respondent-detaining authority is required to serve the grounds of detention within five days in ordinary course. It is submitted that in exceptional circumstances by giving reason, the detaining authority can serve the grounds of detention in between 6-10 days. It is submitted that in the instant case, admittedly, the grounds of detention served upon the petitioner on 26.05.2015, i.e. beyond five days, but no reason assigned as to why it has been served after five days. Accordingly, it is submitted that the detention of the petitioner is illegal, being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 3. On the other hand, Sri R.R. Mishra, learned G.P.-II submits that there is no such delay in service of the grounds, because the Act itself provides that in exceptional circumstances, the detaining authority can serve the grounds after five days, but within ten days. It is submitted that it appears from the record that at the first instance, the detaining authority sent the grounds of detention to the Birsa Munda Central Jail, Ranchi for its service upon the detenue, but the same was returned to the detaining authority with endorsement that the detenue has already been transferred to Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Narayan, Central Jail, Hazaribag on 16.05.2015. Thereafter the detaining authority sent the grounds of detention to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi for serving it to the detenue at Hazaribag. It is submitted that later on grounds of detention sent to Hazaribag on 25.05.2015 within time, but due to the mistake of the Jail employee, same has not been served on 25.05.2015 and served on 26.05.2015. Thus, in view of the aforesaid exceptional circumstances, there is no delay in service of the grounds of detention. 4. Having heard the submissions, I have gone through the record of the case. Thus, in view of the aforesaid exceptional circumstances, there is no delay in service of the grounds of detention. 4. Having heard the submissions, I have gone through the record of the case. From perusal of Annexure-D to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the District Magistrate it appears that the grounds of detention has been sent to the Superintendent of Birsa Munda Central Jail, Ranchi on 20.05.2015. It appears from the record received by the State Counsel that Superintendent of Birsa Mundal Central Jail, Ranchi returned the aforesaid grounds to the District Magistrate Ranchi on the very next day, i.e. 21.05.2015 with endorsement that the detenue has already been transferred to Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Central Jail, Hazaribag on 16. 05.2015. It then appears that vide letter dated 23.05.2015, the Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate Ranchi send the aforesaid grounds to Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi for serving to the detenue at Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Narayan, Central Jail, Hazaribag. It further appears from Annexure-5 that the aforesaid grounds was sent to the Superintendent of Police, Hazaribag vide letter dated 25.05.15 and thereafter the same was served upon the detenue on 26.05. 2015. 5. There is no explanation in the counter-affidavit filed by the Deputy Commissioner as to why he kept the grounds for two days in his office after the same was returned by the Superintendent of Birsa Munda Central Jail, Ranchi. Likewise, there is no explanation as to why the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi kept the grounds in his office for two days, i.e. from 23.05.2015 to 25.05.2015. It is worth mentioning that the reason for delay of service of grounds has not been given to the petitioner. Section 17 (1) of the Act runs as follow:- 17. Grounds of order of detention to be disclosed to person affected by the order.-(1) When a person is detained in pursuance of a detention order, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, but ordinarily not later than five days and in exceptional circumstances and for reasons to be recorded in writing, not later than ten days from the date of detention, communicate to him the grounds on which the order has been made and shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order to the State Government. 6. 6. Thus, from plain reading of the aforesaid Section it is clear that the detaining authority is required to serve the grounds of detention as soon as possible, but ordinarily not later than five days. In the instant case, it appears that though within five days the detaining authority was in a position to serve the copy to the detenue, but he has not done so. It is worth mentioning that on 21.05.2015 itself, the detaining authority came to know that detenue was shifted to Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Narayan, Central Jail, Hazaribag on 16.05.2015, but in spite of that he himself had not taken any step to serve the grounds to the detenue, rather, he send the same to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi for serving it to the detenue at Hazaribag and that too after two days. There is no explanation why he took two days for sending the grounds to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi. Likewise, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi has also not given any explanation as to why he sent the grounds after two days to the Superintendent of Police, Hazaribag. 7. It is worth mentioning that the distance of Hazaribag from Ranchi is about 110 k.m. and a person can reach to Hazaribagh within two hours. But in this case, Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate has taken about five days in reaching to Hazaribag. There is absolutely no explanation for such delay. Section 17 of the Act provides that in exceptional cases, the grounds can be served to the detenue after giving reason for the delay. But in the instant case, there is no exceptional circumstances for delay in service of grounds. Moreover, the detaining authority has not given any reason for the above delay. 8. Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by Law. In the instant case, I find that the detaining authority has not followed the procedure prescribed under Section 17 of the Act. Under the said circumstance, in my view, the detention of the petitioner is against the procedure prescribed by the law, therefore the same cannot be sustained. 9. Accordingly, I allow this writ application and quash the detention order as contained in memo No. 1010 (ii) dated 20.05.15 (Annexure-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Ranchi. 10. Under the said circumstance, in my view, the detention of the petitioner is against the procedure prescribed by the law, therefore the same cannot be sustained. 9. Accordingly, I allow this writ application and quash the detention order as contained in memo No. 1010 (ii) dated 20.05.15 (Annexure-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Ranchi. 10. I further direct the detaining authority to release the petitioner from detention forthwith, if not required otherwise.