JUDGMENT Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. This petition is directed against an order passed in SCC Revision No.39 of 2014, whereby an application filed by tenant-petitioner to extend the interim order has been rejected. 2. It appears that landlord-respondent's suit for eviction and arrears of rent was decreed, against which a revision has been filed by tenant-petitioner, wherein a conditional interim order was granted, providing for tenant-petitioner to deposit entire decretal amount. This interim order was operative till particular date, whereafter it was not extended. The executing court made an observation that the question as to whether interim order is in existence or not, be got clarified from the revisional court. The application to extend the interim order has been rejected by the revisional court, observing that since interim order has not been extended, therefore, it would be appropriate to decide the revision itself on merits, and there is no occasion to extend the interim order. 3. Learned counsel for tenant-petitioner submits that the order impugned has occasioned failure of justice, inasmuch as on account of non extension of interim order, tenant-petitioner would be evicted from the premises and the very purposes of hearing in the revision would be frustrated. Further submission is that condition of the interim order has been complied with. 4. Sri B.B. Jauhari, learned counsel for landlord-respondent submits that conduct of tenant-petitioner disentitled him to grant of any relief from this court and even otherwise, condition of interim order has not been complied with. 5. A perusal of the order impugned goes to show that there is no finding returned by the revisional court as to whether condition contemplated in the interim order has been complied with or not? In such circumstances, when revision itself is to be heard finally, it was appropriate that interim order was extended till disposal of the revision itself, particularly, as it has not been found by revisional court that condition contemplated for grant of interim protection had not been complied with. 6. The present petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the revisional court to make all endeavours to conclude the proceedings of SCC Revision No.39 of 2014, at the earliest, by fixing short dates, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Till revision gets decided conditional interim order would continue in favour of tenant-petitioner. 6. The present petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the revisional court to make all endeavours to conclude the proceedings of SCC Revision No.39 of 2014, at the earliest, by fixing short dates, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Till revision gets decided conditional interim order would continue in favour of tenant-petitioner. However, it is clarified that the question as to whether conditional interim order has been complied with or not, would be open for consideration by the revisional court, and if it is found that condition contemplated in interim order has not been complied with, appropriate orders can always be passed by revisional order, and the matter will proceed accordingly.