Judgment Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. The present appeals have been preferred against the awards, dated 20th September, 2008, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, (for short, the Tribunal), in two separate Claim Petitions, being Claim Petition No.33 of 2006 (subject matter of FAO No. 680 of 2008) and Claim Petition No.34 of 2006 (subject matter of FAO No. 681 of 2008), whereby both the Claim Petitions came to be dismissed, (for short the impugned awards). 2. I have gone through the impugned awards and the records. 3. The matter is already covered by the judgment passed by the Full Bench of this Court in Jagdish Chand Sharma vs. Bachan Singh and others, 2010 ACJ 1229 . 4. A perusal of the impugned awards shows that the Tribunal has rightly made the discussion and has rightly dismissed the Claim Petitions. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed being without merit. 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the appellants prays for liberty to the appellants to seek appropriate remedy Granted. It is made clear that invoking the jurisdiction under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 shall not come in the way of the appellants while seeking alternate remedy, if any, in terms of law. 6. Both the appeals stand disposed of accordingly.