JUDGMENT Mansoor Ahmad Mir 1. Learned counsel for the appellants has laid this 2 :motion for taking on record certain documents. The other side has no objection to the same. Accordingly, the application is granted and the documents are ordered to be taken on record with all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order, dated 16.03.2010, whereby two writ petitions, being CWP No. 55 of 2003, titled as Jaswant Singh & others versus State of H.P. & others, and CWP No. 209 of 2006, titled as Kapil Kumar versus State of H.P. & another, came to be determined and notification, dated 22.12.2001, was quashed (for short "the impugned judgment"). 3. Respondents No. 3 to 5 in CWP No. 55 of 2003 have questioned the impugned judgment, by the medium of the instant appeal, so far it relates to CWP No. 55 of 2003. The other respondents in the said writ petition and the respondents in CWP No. 209 of 2006 have not questioned the impugned judgment on any count, thus, has attained finality so far it 3. relates to them. 4. It is worthwhile to record herein that in both the writ petitions, notification, dated 22.12.2001, relating to the same village, was the subject matter of the writ petitions, which was quashed in terms of the impugned judgment, has attained finality. 5. In view of the said fact, we are of the considered view that this appeal is not maintainable and the same is dismissed as such alongwith all pending applications.