Judgment :- 1. Heard Sri K.V. Raghu Veer, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the writ petitions and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioners are the fair price shop dealers of various fair price shops in Kurnool district. The 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool district suspended the authorisations of the petitioners purportedly basing on the report of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar (Civil Supplies), Adoni, whereunder he stated that the petitioners indulged in malpractice of seeding bogus/inactive ration cards with Aadhar cards while implementing the scheme of Aadhar seeding of ration cards. The version of the petitioners is that they never indulged in such malpractice as they are not associated with the scheme of Aadhar seeding of ration cards. According to the petitioners, the entire scheme was implemented by the Revenue officials themselves and the fair price shop dealers have no role to play in the said scheme, they only distribute the essential commodities to the card holders as per the ration cards issued by the Revenue authorities. As per the scheme, it is submitted that Aadhar card has to be linked up to the name of the person and the job is that of the Revenue officials and not that of the fair price shop dealers. 3. Nextly, it is submitted that the entire data including secret passwords relating to the Aadhar seeding of ration cards was in the computers of the offices of the respondents 3 and 4 for which the petitioners have no access at all. The contention of the petitioners is that at the instance of the persons in the opposite political group, the Revenue authorities have invented the cause to suspend the fair price shop dealers to accommodate the persons belonging to the opposite group. It is also contended by the petitioners that when the irregularity was reported in the Press, the Revenue officials under the apprehension that some severe action would be taken against them, resorted to suspending the authorisations of the petitioners. Therefore, they sought to set aside the suspension order in all these writ petitions on the ground that it was prompted by the mala fides. 4. Therefore, they sought to set aside the suspension order in all these writ petitions on the ground that it was prompted by the mala fides. 4. Counter Affidavit has been filed by the respondents contending that the system of Aadhar seeding to ration cards was introduced by the Government to address the challenges of leakages and diversion of food grains to black market and to weed out the fake and bogus ration cards. It is submitted that the fair price shop dealers are also involved in the programme and therefore, it is not open for the petitioners to contend that they have nothing to do with the programme. The main contention of the respondents is that the petitioners, who are the fair price shop dealers, gained access to the secret digital code with connivance of Deputy Tahsildar (Civil Supplies), Adoni Mandal, Food Inspector, Adoni and Computer Operators working in Tahsildars office, Adoni and got bogus ration cards Aadhar seeded in private net centres in Adoni town, Kurnool district. It is also contended that the petitioners committed some other irregularities and therefore, the suspension of their authorisations pending enquiry is perfectly legal and shall not be interfered with in the present writ petitions. 5. Under Clause 8 of the Andhra Pradesh State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 (the Control Order, for short), the duty of issuing the ration cards to the public is that of the Revenue officials and the cards shall be delivered only on proper identification. Further, under the said Clause, the Revenue officials authorised to vary, suspend or cancel the card on noticing any irregularities in issuing the ration cards. The Control Order nowhere states that the fair price shop dealers are in any way concerned with the process of issuance of the ration cards. Under Clause 7 of the Control Order, they are only to supply the scheduled commodities basing on the ration card produced by the card holder. 6. As to the contention that there are some other irregularities committed by the petitioners, it has to be stated that the suspension order is based on the allegation of the malpractice committed in the Aadhar seeding to ration cards but on no other allegation. Therefore, the said contention cannot be accepted. 6. As to the contention that there are some other irregularities committed by the petitioners, it has to be stated that the suspension order is based on the allegation of the malpractice committed in the Aadhar seeding to ration cards but on no other allegation. Therefore, the said contention cannot be accepted. Under the programme Aadhar seeding to ration cards, the Revenue officials can weed out the bogus cards but the authorisations of the fair price shop dealers cannot be suspended on the ground that some irregularities took place while implementing the scheme. Further, no material was brought on record showing as to how the petitioners gained access to the secret passwords relating to the programme which are entirely within the knowledge of the Revenue officials in their respective offices. 7. Another important factor which requires to be noticed is that though it is mentioned in the counter that some disciplinary action was caused to be initiated against the Deputy Tahsildar (Civil Supplies), who was mainly responsible for the malpractice, so far no action has been initiated against him. Moreover, the entire basis for the order of suspension is nothing but the report submitted to the RDO by the Civil Supplies Tahsildar, who is mainly responsible for the malpractice. The submission made in the counter that the petitioners themselves accepted their involvement in the malpractice while the matter was enquired into, has no legal basis to be considered. Normally, this Court will not interfere with the order of suspension pending enquiry. But, in the present writ petitions, this Court is thoroughly convinced that no prima facie case is made out against the petitioners warranting suspension of their authorisations as they have no role to play with the scheme of Aadhar seeding to ration cards. The suspension orders passed by the RDO against the petitioners, in the considered view of this Court, are ex facie illegal and they are liable to be set aside in these writ petitions. 8. Consequently, the respective suspension orders passed against the petitioners, who are the fair price shop dealers, are revoked. All the writ petitions are allowed accordingly. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed. No costs.