JUDGMENT Suneet Kumar, J. The defendant/petitioners is assailing the order dated 15.11.2014 passed by the Additional District Judge Court No. 2, Firozabad in Civil Revision No. 126 of 2011 arising out of order dated 15.11.2011 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sikohabad in Suit No. 475 of 2007 allowing the amendment application filed by the respondent/plaintiffs. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the respondents filed a suit for permanent injunction against the petitioners to restrain them from interfering in the suit property. The petitioners contested the suit by filing a written statement on 1.7.2009 wherein it was stated that they are owners of the suit property vide registered sale deed dated 29.4.2005. Accordingly, the respondents made an application for amending the suit seeking a prayer for cancellation of the sale deed. The learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the amendment would change the nature of the suit. 3. I have perused impugned order and I do not find any illegality, infirmity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The relief for permanent injunction cannot be granted hence the owner of the property and therefore, the Court below had right allowed the amendment for cancelation of the sale deed. The amendment appears to be necessary also in order to avoid multiplicity of the litigation between the parties. The petition is devoid of merit, accordingly, is dismissed.