JUDGMENT : Learned counsel for the petitioner-Assessee prays for two weeks' time to produce on record the documents of contemporary period including for registration under the CST Act to show that Skimmed Milk Powder (SMP) was included in the list of raw material purchased by the Assessee for manufacturing of standard milk, which was sold by it and except for the period 1995 to 2003 when the said omission was corrected by the Assessee, the SMP has always been purchased at concessional rate of tax against ST-17 declaration form, and the SMP has been so used in manufacturing of standard milk sold by it, which according the Assessee was also the requirement of law viz. Prevention of Food Adulteration Act etc. The authorities below have held against the Assessee that since for the contemporary period i.e. 1995 to 2003, SMP was not included in the list of raw material in the registration certificate of the assessee, therefore, it has misused the ST-17 for purchase of SMP at the concessional rate of tax at 4% and, therefore, the additional tax liability at full rate was imposed upon it, however, the appellate authority below has set aside the penalty under Section 64 of the Act for such misuse of ST-17 of the RST Act and, therefore, the question of penalty is not involved in the present case, but only of additional tax liability on the assessee. List the case after two weeks, as prayed along-with identical Civil Revision Nos.505/2006, 109/2007, 111/2007, 110/2007 and 112/2007.