JUDGMENT : Heard the petitioner in person and Mr. S. D. Sanjay Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India. 2. By this writ application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or appropriate order/writ commanding the Union of India to incorporate/include the Bhojpuri language in the VIII Schedule of the Constitution of India by constituting a Commission to make a recommendation to the Hon’ble the President in the light of the provisions of the Constitution of India. Analogous relief(s) thereto have also been sought. 3. The writ application as seen from paragraph 1 thereof has been filed on behalf of the residents who are people, farmers, labours, men and women of SC/ST , advocates, teachers students, freedom fighter of all the Panchayats, Blocks, Districts, States in the territory of India. The application does not pertain to any wrong or injury caused to the petitioner which requires to be corrected by issuance of appropriate direction/order/writ. 4. Having heard the petitioner in person and Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondent- Union of India this Court finds substance in the submission of the counsel for the Union of India that the present writ petition in the form it has been presented is not maintainable. 5. However, the petitioner state that the application be disposed of giving him liberty to pursue the representation which he has already filed before the appropriate authority of the Union of India. 6. The application is disposed of permitting the petitioner to pursue the representation wherever it has been filed in accordance with law.