Judgment : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral) The respondents have filed the replies. 2. Respondents No. 1 and 2 have tendered the unconditional apology and have thrown themselves at the mercy of the Court. 3. Respondent No. 3, in para 3 of the preliminary submissions of the reply, has tendered unconditional apology, but has stated that he was not aware of the Court orders. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 was asked as to in which capacity, he was appearing before the Court, if respondent No. 3 did not know the Court orders. 5. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 stated at the Bar that the unconditional apology submitted by respondent No. 3 be accepted and he will not indulge in any such activities in future. His statement is taken on record. 6. In the given circumstances, the Rule is dropped and contempt petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner is at liberty to undertake the process of 'Beat of Drum' so that all the persons/people of the locality will have knowledge of the Court orders. The directions contained in the orders passed by the Court from time to time in CWPIL No. 4 of 2013 be implemented in letter and spirit. Copy dasti.