Judgment Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. In both these appeals, challenge is to the judgment dated 9.10.2014 passed in CWP(T) No.3040 of 2008 titled Rajeev Kumar versus State of HP and others and CWP (T) No.3754 of 2008 titled Ranjit Singh and others versus State of HP and others whereby both writ petitions came to be determined, for short the impugned judgment. 2. It is a fact that the appellants-writ petitioners have participated in the selection process and could not make a grade. Thus, cannot make a “U” turn and challenge the selection process. 3. We have gone through the impugned judgment. The learned Writ Court has rightly appreciated the judgment delivered by the apex Court in Prem Singh and others versus Haryana State Electricity Board and others (1996) 4 SCC 319 and other judgments of this Court. 4. The appeal merits to be dismissed on other ground also that much water has flown by now read with the admission made by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants are now well settled. 5. Having said so, no interference is called for. Thus, the impugned judgment is upheld and appeals are dismissed.