JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. This writ petition is directed against the judgment and order, dated 12.03.2007, made by the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") in Original Application (M) No. 176 of 2006, titled as Murari Lal versus Managing Director and others (for short "the impugned judgment"). 2. It appears that the respondent herein had filed the Original Application before the Tribunal claiming regularization of his services from the date he completed ten years of continuous service, was resisted by the writ petitioners herein on the ground that no such post/cadre was available. 3. The Tribunal, though has recorded in the penultimate para of the impugned judgment that no post was available and no such cadre was existing, directed the writ petitioners herein to create such a cadre and appoint the respondent herein as such. 4. We are of the view that the impugned judgment, on the face of it, is not tenable for the reason that the Courts do not have the power to direct the employer to create posts or to enhance the cadre strength. 5. However, we have gone through the judgment, dated 01.12.2005, made by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 214 of 2004, titled as HP State Forest Corporation Limited & another versus Hari Dass, the facts of which were similar to the case in hand. 6. Accordingly, we deem it proper to set aside the impugned judgment and direct the respondents to consider the case of the respondent herein for regularization in accordance with the policy and the Rules occupying the field and also to give him seniority, if he is entitled to. 7. Having said so, the impugned judgment is modified, as indicated hereinabove and the writ petition is disposed of accordingly alongwith all pending applications.