JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. The writ petitioners have questioned the judgment and order, dated 14.11.2007, made by the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") in Original Application (M) No. 90 of 2007, titled as Chand versus State of H.P. and another (for short "the impugned judgment"), on the grounds taken in the memo of the writ petition. 2. Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Additional Advocate General, stated at the Bar that the Tribunal had made the impugned judgment on the basis of the judgment and order, dated 19.07.2007, made by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 180 of 2001, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh versus Shri Sarab Dayal. Further stated that the State had filed Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court and the matter was remanded to this Court, was again decided in terms of the judgment and order, dated 31.05.2012. Thereafter, the aggrieved persons have questioned the judgment and order, dated 31.05.2012, before the Apex Court by the medium of SLP, which is still pending. His statement is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, we deem it proper to dispose of this writ petition by providing that the parties shall abide by the decision to be made by the Apex Court in the SLP. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly alongwith all pending applications.