Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 1434 (HP)

Chairmancum Deputy Commissioner v. Seema Mehta

2015-10-08

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, SURESHWAR THAKUR

body2015
JUDGMENT Mansoor Ahmad Mir CMP (M) No. 1242 of 2015 1. By the medium of this limitation petition, the appellants applicants have sought condonation of delay of 79 days, which has creptin in filing the present Letters Patent Appeal. 2. We have gone through the limitation petition read with the impugned judgment and are of the considered view that the appellants applicants have carved out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. LPA No. 160 of 2015 3. Appeal is taken on Board. 4. Issue notice. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondent. 5. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 08.05.2015, made by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 5318 of 2013, titled as Smt. Seema Mehta versus Chairman-cum Deputy Commissioner and another (for short "the impugned judgment"). 6. We have perused the record. 7. In terms of the impugned judgment, the writ respondents appellants herein were directed to consider the case of the writ petitioner respondent herein for regular appointment, is just a consideration order, which the respondents have to examine and no rights have been determined. 8. In the given circumstances, the impugned judgment merits to be upheld and the appeal is to be dismissed. Accordingly, the impugned judgment is upheld and the appeal is dismissed along with all pending applications with a direction to the writ respondents appellants herein to make the consideration order within eight weeks.